Am I fucked? Or are LLMs really the way to go in the future. Like 99% is coded my an llm, I'm just making sure the code looks good or tweak a few things that it really can't get.Sometimes it feels like I'm giving up my skills for comfort, so I try to do manual coding here and then for hobby stuff.But on the other hand, I have so much more time for different stuff, more education, more planning and designing instead of scouring docs or stackoverflow.
It's the same thing with mental arithmetic. Do you value those skills? Or would you rather have the calculator do 117388403973+839005883/47488588383*7488593^69-553 for you instantly?
>>106495196Embrace it but remember the models change at the whim of the finickiest kike.Try working with local models or models stored where you completely control the server.
>>106495196Nothing's changed.
you are probably coding very basic things. No way AI can be even remotely productive in slightly large databases with complex logic
>>106497015Programmers are being replaced thought.
>>106497015Tell me what you consider complex logic.
>>106497058anything outside of "top 20 programming project ideas"
And a sex robot is 70% code 25% hardware 5% silicon
>>106497015Anon, I kid you not, Claude Code did about 70% of the work for a multiple man-month long project I had for a medium sized food processing company. I think they cut like 4 people who's job it was to do all that shit manually in Excel. It really is like having a junior but for only $200/month, as long as you use it correctly and have realistic expectations. The biggest shortcomings I found with Claude is its front end skills, but I don't really give a shit considering I specialize in internal enterprise tooling.
>>106496393The funniest thing is that an LLM would struggle with "calculating" this
>>106496393>>106497778AGI?
>>106497832That's a MoE model, so it's not "general" and is basically an advanced form of conning benchmarks despite what your telemarketer friends have been telling you
>>106497870I have no friends and it was a joke fellow /g/ chud monster
>>106497015You still need fairly simple components in a simple system, no?Sure, you still need engineers to architect the system. But when you need a function that takes parameters a, b, c and shits out a result d based on some simple business logic, AI can make it for you faster than you would manually.
>>106497015It can, I do this all day. It's all about giving them small enough tasks with enough context.If you just say "here's a code base that does X I also need to to do Y" you're going to get slop.
>>106497900Precisely this
