Do we have at least one weirdo on this board doing an MS-DOS project for run?
>>106497081I want to, I just struggle to think what to actually make.
>>106497119how about an app that renames all files in a folder to their md5 or crc32 hash?
>>106497119Vydia is pretty terrifying and cool, because you get to mess with VGA/mode X/Soundblaster/PIT timer
>>106497119port spore
>>106497081I got most of the leaked dos 6.0 source to build, even found the correct packer so all the assembly stuff has the same md5 as what came on the floppy.
Why yes anon I do still use Borland Turbo C
>>106497081Wrote a shitty Forth in C using djgpp. Writing a Forth in assembly is so much nicer so that's what I might do next. I also messed around in dxforth which is quite nice. Wrote a test project to see how graphics output works and set up packet drivers to see how one would do network programming.MSDOS is unironically a great platform for running single applications.>>106497878Why bother when we have FreeDOS which is actively maintained.
>>106497987FreeDOS is goated
>>106497987>Why bother when we have FreeDOS which is actively maintained.Mainly to exercise my reversing skills
>>106497081I was thinking about doing a 3d rasterizer in Mode 13h but I got lazy.
>>106497081>conioI SPIT
>>106497081I'm trying to add DOS support to the game I'm working on
>>106498992Same executable, taking advantage of that dual bullshit .exes do?
>>106497081Yes, but I use Watcom C rather than Turbo C for the most part (I generated better code for dos). I do have the manuals for Turbo C version 2 to hand in paperback book form though. Turbo C++ is Turbo C version 3.
