[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/g/ - Technology


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: 1744512311814748.png (1.38 MB, 1000x1129)
1.38 MB
1.38 MB PNG
Like OpenAI gives you only 12 free images a day in Sora, but with Google you can edit as many images as you apparently can, at least I didn't bump into a limit yet.
>>
>>106497989
They are fundamentally different.
>>
>>106498085
yes. in that, google actually makes money and offers value from its suite of products that dominate in their spaces.
for example, adsense is their most profitable, or it might be compute related shit now but anyway.
they are making billions of dollars from people clicking ads, and companies paying them money to put eyeballs infront of their ads.

meanwhile, in clownworld crony capitalism openAI makes no money, and is getting their shit pushed in by a handful of others. and in their "invest in us" pitch that i read, one of the key points of focus was around "dont expect to get any investment money back, retard" i shit you not.
>>
>>106498119
>dont expect to get any investment money back
Isn't that just standard boilerplate type language to avoid litigation for any company though?
I'm not a lawyer
This is not investment advice
Read this post at your own risk, poster may be mentally retarded
No guarantee of correct information, presented "As is"
>>
>>106498224
right that is true, but it was ludicrous basically when your pitch leans into that
and your pitch is basically at that point a plea for help because it details
>how much money it costs to do everything youre doing
>how much money you are not making, year after year
>how much you want to keep expanding, with no profitable revenue models

again theyd be fine if their shit was innovative. it isnt, theres no moat.
>>
>>106498260
I definitely agree that there doesn't seem to much of a moat at all.
Only thing I'd say is in late 2022 it probably seemed more plausible that there could be one, before people figured all of this shit out.
But at this point, yeah it seems like a lot of money is being lit on fire.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.