Anons on /g/ like to heap virulent abuse on it every other day, but when need arises, they go back crawling to it on all fours, reeking with desperation, and can't even name an alternative that's even half as good. I laugh.
>>106499062It's very useful, and only gets heat because people like to project their unfounded beliefs and delusions onto it.
>Anons on /g/ like to heap virulent abuse on it every other dayi love making shit up
>>106499062>>106499174nobody here even talks about wikipedia, much less to hate on it, what are you on about?
>>106499341Check the catalog. Every other thread is railing on Wikipedia.
>>106499328>>106499341Methinks he chose the wrong image.
>>106499062I never even go there at all. I used to check the Early Life section, but now I never need to.
>>106499362wehh i actually checked and now i feel dumb for falling for this :<
>>106499377op is a silly billy confirmed
>>106499377>>106499409>>106499426why do zoomers talk like this
Wikipedia is a city of 7 million articles. While there are shithole districts on Wikipedia (usually indicated by blue locks in the corner), there are some nice articles that are left alone. Unless Elon Musk gets Grok to write an encyclopedia, we are kind of stuck with wiki, and I learnt that the hard way.
>>106499062metapediaetc/thread
>>106499062>Alternative to propaganda is more propagandakek
>>106499062I'm not allowed to use Wikipedia.
>>106499062the holocaust didn't happen. get over it.
>>106499062>, and can't even name an alternative that's even half as goodthe library, which were all closed now thanks for playing human beings, enjoy the dystopian future dlc.
>>106499062I was a wikipedia editor for 5 years. Not to sound smug about it, but the general article quality in my field of expertise (that I have a phd for) was abysmal and I was bringing it up to current academic standards. I've quit this year though after beeing the victim of admin abuse. There was an ideologically driven other author doing an edit war, I called him out and reported him. A first admin basically agreed with me but refused to do anything about it. Then the other user got his friends involved to gang up on me and insult me, including another admin. That's when I quit. I did some research after that though and found out that the hostile author keeps getting temporary bans every year for a decade now for insults and edit wars, but is protected because he's a tranny.
>>106499062>go to article on the trans woman musician called "Ramona Andra Langley">edit this article>replace she/her with he/him>publish this edited article>refresh>got reverted>maybe it's time to edit again>get rekt and blocked by adminsI am not allowed to use Retardpedia
>>106499062Wikipedia has cancer
>>106499062This is how they waste your donation money.
>>106499845>chudpediaYea, no thanks.
>>106500610You do not have a PhD.
>>106500900Embezzlement.
>>106499062It's a left-leaning website that regularly censors information. Use it to look up the dates of events, vidya release info and other static details but the rest isn't trustworthy.>>106500610Many such cases.
