ITT: We judge each other based on our internet speeds. I'll start.
>>106516118
>>106516118We also judge based on where you go to measure your internet speed
like 120 and 28 ish
>>106516193>Fast
>latencymogs the thread in your'e path
>mogs everyone ITT>even more so because it only costs 70 bucks a month>init7.net
Insane shit in here. I can't even watch 480p on youtube if the aspect ratio is wide. Small price to pay for living off the grid.
>>106516391That's insane
>>106516391Genuinely why do you even need that for a residence?
>>106516391is this p2p or multiplexed TDMA faggotry?
>>106516504>>106516551>>106516627VM with VPS connection newfags
>>106516391>still posting that 2022 screenshotStop posting speeds you don't actually have
>>106516118Eurocuck or third worlder>>106516167American/Asian>>106516193Eurocuck>>106516291Inawoods americuck>>106516352American
>>106516352I'd personally rather have a bit of additional loaded latency than be a bandwidthlit.anything under 100mbps in 2025 is jewish, I don't care what your latency is.
>>106516746Latency requires closeby infrastructure, so high latency is more jewish, not the opposite. Try living in the third world where the closest CDN or any other major datacenter is 70-120 ms away from you, you would want to kill yourself daily (I do )
>>106516713>American/Asianwrong
>>106516713Missing one>>106516391Swiss
>>106516782Sure, but this guy is acting superior when the others in the thread are posting generally decent latency.Why should I give a fuck about 1-2ms ping vs my 10-20ms ping?Again, i'll take my extra ~1900mbps and the added latency every single day of the week.
>>106516805Probably didn't want to reply to the 3 year old bait, since the guy just posts the exact same speedtest anytime he wants to "show off". I doubt he even has access to those speeds anymore or else he'd have a more recent test to post.
>>106516812Fair enough>>106516796South american, SP/Santiago/Buenos Aires only.>>106516391Have no fucking clue, also, no way you are sending that to personal computer.
>>106516877First thing I thought was american, major datacenter, did not disappoint lmao
>>106517221Small perks of living near Ashburn.
>>106517199the only relation i have with SA is that american fucked us more than the nazi
wifi on my T480
>>106516352>>106516746it's harder to get low load latency when you're hitting physical hardware limitations (1000BASE‑T bandwidth, NIC speed, router CPU speed, etc)at 250mbit i was doing 0/1/1 or 1/1/1
>>106517287Correct, at higher speeds it's a lot harder to handle loaded latency, won't stop retards from acting superior with their 50mbps though.
>>106517287poorfag cope
>>106516118i've got 8gig from gfiberits been a good upgrade from shitrum internet
>>106517313What good does that do you without 10 gig hardware? Your processors won’t be able to decompress anything you download fast enough either
>>106517332i have 10gig hardware
>>106517285
Two more days
>>106517426damn, i feel sorry for you anon... hope it will get better
>>106517426Starlink exists
>>106516391Stop posting that shit, you butt hurt cretin! That's not even yours, you pathetic LARPer!>>106516667Nobody cares, you butt hurt cretin! Those internet connection speeds aren't yours anyway!>>106516688This!He's obviously embarrassed to reveal his real internet connection speeds because they're so slow!
>>106517285Not bad for wifi, though that ping isn't amazing.
>>106517537I blame the ping on my ISP-provided router. wifi speeds are pretty good since I replaced the original card with an AX210 (wifi 6E) on all my machines, because I'm renting and drilling holes for ethernet cables isn't allowed. even my home server has to run on wifi kek
>>106517556You can't use your own router?
>>106517600technically ISPs where I live "allow" it but nobody does it because they make it pretty difficult. the easiest I could do would be to connect an access point to the router and use that for wifi instead, but I never felt the need to honestly
if you have less than 250 just get starlink. The ping for it nowadays is phenomenal, less than 30 ms
>>106517618Yea fair enough, as long as you're not needing low loaded latency it wont matter too much.
>>106517472it sounds so hot when you bully me and call me a cretin, gosh
>>106517855
>>106516746+10ms/+12ms isn't bad since you probably won't be maxing that out while gaming anywayalso what router do you use? mine only has 1gbit WAN and I'm thinking of upgrading
>>106518022I'm using a Dream Router 7 since I also use Ubiquiti access points.Though if I were buying today i'd probably pick up the Cloud Gateway Fiber since it has 2x 10Gbps SFP+ and a 10GbE port instead of the Dream router 7 which just has a single 10Gbps SFP+ port.Though it doesn't have Wifi, I would just buy another access point.
its ok
>>106518098that loaded latency is pretty shit
>>106517855I see!
I can actually get 1100mbps if I use something that is 2.5gb capable.All 2.5gb nics are shit tho
>>106518278>All 2.5gb nics are shit thoaccurate, and I say that as someone using a 2.5GbE NIC.Gonna buy a motherboard with a 10GbE for my next platform upgrade
>>106518310My main PC is on 10g and my NASThe NIC would be for my router.The way around is is 10G NICs, but support is limited to mostly intel for base-t and nbase-t is only properly supported on X710s.Might wait for the rtl8127 is that ever gets supported or move to something Linux based
Finally got fiber, still never seed.
