Literally can't use the internet without it
>>106516598 try browsing around for an hour without it lmao i dont even want to cant even bring myself to do it just for an exercise it would be so terrible
>>106516673I tried it once 3 years ago and I still can't believe how normalfags live daily.
>>106516598adguard is better
>>106516691Why only once?
>>106516691That's the same people who put their personal files in the cloud. Total trash.
>>106516598I didn't know what the fuck was going on when I was opening porn sites and getting redirected. Then I realized Chrom yeeted uBlock. I have the lite version now, don't think I've fapped yet since though.
Ad blocking can be done by variety of methods but many websites are simply user hostile in their design.Bad ui thats not related to ads, obnoxious prompts to get you to make an accont and login. Youtube looks fucking retarded with like 6 videos fitting on the front page and you need to use an extension or ublock script to make it be 5 vids per row
>>106516598I used to think the same, then I noticed the issue is Javascript.
>>106516706Adguard is better at blocking ads with its default lists (which ublock uses as the bulk of its defaults), but the zapper in UBO is better than using Adguard.
>>106516598A fine addition to supporting browser like Chromium-based stuff and Firefox. Even for cucks using Edge.
>>106516706uBlock is better because it works and I already have it, so zero effort
>>106516706Doesn't work on jewtube IIRC
>>106516802Duh. But try browsing with JS disabled and using the Internet is an exercise of futility.
>chrome shuts it down>still allows same extension under different name that's almost as powerful
>>106520163It’s a normie filter. As usual. I’ll have to install the lite extension on my parents PC next time I visit them.
>>106516598I've been using ublock for almost a decade, then after the manifest stuff I switched to Brave and used the built-in adblocking, and I see literally no difference.They use the same ad lists too. They also both have element pickers for adding rules yourself.
>>106516763>Bad ui thats not related to ads,Because an increasing number of websites is designed specifically for phones since this is where they get their traffic from.And they don't bother making a proper computer version.
>>106516598It's over.
I use Wipr for Safari. Works like a charm.
seeing even a single ad on youtube sends me in uncontrolled rageliterally makes me go apeshit
Honestly, the ads aren't even that bad, what IS bad however is shitty webdevs and their buggy, ugly and downright lagfest websites.I find myself fixing retards websites more than I do caring about ads.The web version of Discord TO THIS DAY IS STILL BROKEN, THE UI WAS CHANGED MONTHS AGO.If someone is typing in a channel locked from you, the typing notification is half off page, they have a retarded titlebar taking up space in the browser because they created that shit for the garbage app.I am not installing your shitty app, kill yourselves, you ruined the fucking app even harder than the browser version.Twitter is a shitfest of UI changes from around the year before Musk took over and has only gotten worse.I don't want to see shitty football in news, I actively hid every single sports related garbage news and it showed more, so I hid the entire right sidebar.They ruined the tweets feed, you used to be able to see only their tweets easily in one of the feeds on a persons profile, but they renamed and changed it to show replies and showed retweets too.WHY?! I SPECIFICALLY CLICKED REPLIES TO SEE ONLY THEIR SHIT, I DON'T WANT TO SEE RETWEETS, THAT'S WHAT THE MAIN FEED IS FOR YOU FUCKING TARDSThat shit made me mass hide retweets outright for years until I decided to make a style that would partially hide and dim retweets, and if I hover it would expand it.tl;dr FUCK EVERY WEB DEVELOPER KILL YOURSELVESt. webdev
>>106516598And stops half the internet from working properly>>106516691>>106516721You sound fun at parties>>106520569What would be the point in thatIt's not 2004 anymore>>106521400Yes we know you're autistic
>>106521664so why do you still use them?
>>106520163Does Lite work exactly the same as Origin?I read somewhere that it actually loads ads, it just doesn't show them. is it true?
>>106516598you can. another developer provide the same service or you can using userscript that you made for yourself.
>>106521400I would rather stare at a black screen with no audio or video for the entire length of an ad than see an ad
