Lol lmao xD even, imagine needing resources when duckduckgo, yandex chatgpt chin-gpt and so on exist.Just go read something.Pro-guiness on tap thread, no cans or bottles allowed.
>>106517657Based.
>>106517661heh
>>106517657i only use sveltekit
>Just updated my neocities site
>>106518163show it, censor whatever you need to censor or just yolo it, a pic will do
>>106518126would
>>106518126no actual back end though?
>>106518163Well, are you gonna show us, Anon? The whole class is waiting.
>>106517858Name 1 (one) advantage of using jQuery in 2025
>>106519183second, we got people trying to center a div over here>>106518163NO PRESSURE>>106519990there's no advantage, I don't use it, I won't use it, I don't need it. it's useless. but it defined modern js's first stepsthe key is in "second coming", aka do it again jQuery, show us the light, show us which features we were lacking, what is the way forward, and most importantly, purge react and node
>>106520021* from the FEdid u know jQuery plus som library (just another js added on the html) had full SPA functionality like 15 years ago if not more? ajax helpers, low resources real time animations and so onthe comouters back then were literal toasters, but they could handle a spa, some style animations and so on,, thx to jQuery
>>106520066>>106519990>>106520021just google the computer specs from 15 years ago, normal comouters, and share insight
>>106520021>there's no advantage, I don't use it, I won't use it, I don't need it. it's useless. but it defined modern js's first steps>the key is in "second coming", aka do it again jQuery, show us the light, show us which features we were lacking, what is the way forward, and most importantly, purge react and nodeI don't think we need jQuery to show us new features. Also React and Node are decent because they just work, but there are alternatives to each (Angular, Vue, Svelte; Deno, Bun)
>website is supposed to be 14kb or lessmy font is 4422kbthis is retarded
>>106517657Can't spell Guinness, >no cans or bottles allowed.Nitrosurge wants a word.OP's an imposter.
>>106520138>Also React and Node are decent because they just workI too.enjoy the deprecation and vulnerability warnings, having a server, on the front end? brilliant afwho needs basic files when you can have dependency clow cyrcus. I get your point.Guys, pack it up, react + node for FE is based (lmao)
>>106520167DAAAAAMN DONAL, BACK AT IT AGAIN WITH THE JEWJEW CUM!
>>106520167>Nitrosurgethe what? elaborate
>>106520204>>106520167>googles itI definitely wouldn't, I think that's like being overly protestant in the pub
>>106520208I was a sceptic too until I said fuckit and bought one, it's smooth as christmas, exactly like a pulled pint, none of that gassy shit from regular draft cans or bottles.
>>106520234look, cans and bottles are not meant to be consumed
>>106520195>I too.enjoy the deprecation and vulnerability warningsYes they are good. They're telling you that you have security problems that need fixing. Other package managers for other languages might not tell you this, so you don't know if your application has security problems in its dependencies.
>>106520244we didn't have this problem with jQuery, mostly because it didn't have a back end server in the front endyou get a pass because you're saying what the senior was saying, but regardless I press the button> we need all these packages btwdo we? do we really? do we really need all those packages and node and dooobedooobedaaa? do we really do?
>>106520528>we didn't have this problem with jQuery, mostly because it didn't have a back end server in the front endWith jQuery you would still need to update it regularly because security issues could potentially arise in jQuery.>a back end server in the front endIt's not a back-end server, it's Node running so that it can constantly watch and bundle your React app because you're probably using JSX which the browser doesn't understand. So it constantly transpiles your JSX into JS.You don't need to use that though. You can use React without JSX for example. But why does it bother you to have Node running on your dev machine? Why is that a problem?It seems what you really have a problem with is the large number of dependencies in a typical React front-end, and maybe in front-ends using other frameworks. Okay well just write vanilla JS then. Today's vanilla JS is very powerful.
>>106521000you know you know more than me, I'll let you be, but careful with that package though
>>106518312>>106519183>>106520021https://projectdream.neocities.org/
>>106521199I'm not going to read all that text, but I really like it you mentioned comodores or some shit, that shit's cool
>>106521000>Okay well just write vanilla JS then. Today's vanilla JS is very powerful.you're going to do that for me anon?it's ok you can write react it's fine, we need devs after all
>>106517657>be localization company>break words in half
we eating good todayhttps://youtu.be/9xzqqZMXjjg
>>106517657deadliest warriors were hillarious.
imagine being so terminally online that you make websites.
>>106521374I'm just saying you can choose what you want. And the choices available today are much better than jQuery in my view.>>106522574Web devs can make good money. Pic related.
If were are developing the web does that make us spiders?
>>106523455The web is more like a spoke hub now
what do I use to host images for a website with user generated content
>>106524228FBI should have a good list for you
>>106524261?
>>106524228I know the answer to this question but if I tell you then you might beat me in the job market
>>106524502don't worry I'm never getting a job
>>106524228I got u. Start a discord server and never invite anyone. Set up a node.js program that uses the discord api to simply upload everything to your discord chat and keep track of the message id for simple retrieval
