https://thenewstack.io/microsofts-rust-bet-from-blue-screens-to-safer-code/Microsoft is rewriting all of Windows in Rust and is going to begin to force hardware vendors to do the same. What a fucking clown world. Technology is over. This affects more than just Windows. It'll affect Linux drivers as well that hardware vendors provide. It's pretty much over for computing at this point. Rust is a cancer that has spread and we're now terminal.
>>106518726And yet they still don't have a way to make GUIs for Windows in it.
based freetardtroons now we won't be able to jailbreak or sideload anything so we can be even safer
>>106518726>Microsoft is rewriting all of Windows in RustThis is great, because this will kill Rust.
>>106518858>>106518726two more weeks
Do you know WHY drastic measures like this had to be taken? Because cniles just could NOT stop writing vulnerable code. 60 years of the language and its subsets and they still couldn't figure it out, so something had to change and it's clear the cnile engineers weren't getting any better. Literally reaping what they sowed.
>>106518726>>106518797>>106518858>>106519082I personally, as a developer (17 years running C# C++ WebShit), wouldn't touch this abysimally stupid language, but I'm happy there are people masochistic (or untallented) enough to do it.In the end, the user will lose a few milliseconds of performance but gain (potentially) security, so basically a win for the consoomer.
>>106518726No, i'm terminal.
>>106518726>Hire 10.000 new curryniggers per yearWe're sorry making an OS is hard.Please accept a 1/3 chance of us killing your SSD.
>>106518858I cannot wait for Microsoft's corporate rust. Then they can dump all the troons and weird clingers.
>>106518726Realistically, how do we fight this push for Rust? Is Mark Russinovich puppeteering the troons or are they controlling him?
>>106518726>Microsoft is rewriting all of Windows in Rustthat's not what that article says
>>106519494>Reading the full article>Reading anything>2025Ay yo, bro like... yo. seriously. <skull emoji>
>>106519420Microsoft already adopted rust like 3 or 4 years ago and it's used in the kernel already. Nothing changed. It's not like the Linux kernel where corporations end up dictating the project. I don't think Microshit contributes back to Rust at all.
>>106519585it's strange they wrote an entire c++ compiler so they don't have to touch gcc/clang and yet they use rust just like that?
>>106518726>>106519455You guys ever thought that maybe it's gaining adoption cause it's actually good?
>>106519642>gaining adoptionIt's gaining shills. I've never seen a language pushed so hard, and I don't think it's very good.
>>106519663So you got filtered, that's good to know
>>106519615I assume you're talking about visual c++? That existed well before Rust was even an infant. Plus it likely was more so to give developers better integration into .NET (along with visual C#, VB, F#) Supposedly parts of Windows has also been in C# for awhile now.
>>106519685Look at the way you speak about it, you're in a cult. There's still time to run it's not, "unsafe" even though that's what they tell you.
>>106519686Visual C++ was made for white men. Microsoft chose a different direction, so I suppose they need whatever guardrails and automated tools they can get to extract some usefulness out of the jeets.
>>106519706clang is better
the funny part is OP is not even a troon, just an emotional little low-test male with zero arguments against Rust
>>106518726damn. soon we'll need 7ghz 12 core cpus with v-cache to even use a web browser without lagging
>>106519294> Web developer
>>106519082has nothing to do with c and everything to do with the incredible servings of ancient spaghetti layers and reliance on third party kernel mode drivers. rust will not fix the bluescreens, you can make equally dumb mistakes in rust, pajeet vibe code kernel drivers written in rust, will simply be a new age of horrors, the like the world has never seen, far more terrible than 90s spaghetti.
>>106519615the microsoft compiler is very old. predates clang by more than a decade, and gcc wasnt very good back then.
someone will probably leak shit
>>106520052You won't come around web services with bigger projects
