>30% of Microsoft code is written by AI>"I'd say maybe 20%, 30% of the code that is inside of our repos today and some of our projects are probably all written by software,">Google CEO Sundar Pichai in October said that more than 25% of new code was written by AI. Earlier this month, Shopify CEO Tobi Lutke told employees that they will have to prove AI cannot do a job before asking for more headcount. Similarly, Duolingo CEO Luis von Ahn on Monday announced in a memo that the language-teaching company will gradually turn to AI in lieu of human contractors. Is this true?
>>106524052Unit tests are about as big as the actual code.AI has become pretty good at writing unit tests, so this statistic is not as big of a deal as it seems.
>>106524052That would explain why everything they put out lately is even more broken and buggy than usual.
>>106524236>AI has become pretty good at writing unit testsso they use AI for mostly useless tasks
>>106524236How do they know that the unit test tests the correct thing and verifies the results correctly?He also said "some of our projects" are all written by AI.
>>106524052Last time a MAGMA company said that it was only true because they replaced their autocomplete algorithm by an some AI that did the same thing 3% better.
>>106524052That was four months ago. AI is writing at least 50% of all software developed now. The future is here and it is coming.
A ceo wouldn't know a git repo from a foosball table, the fuck does he know about the percentage of code across repos that's generated?
>>106524338The amount of unit tests correlates with how shitty the software is.If people rely on unit tests, it means there no longer is a single dude who knows how all of it works and checks the newbs code.Instead everyone is just guessing and praying to the Unit Test God, that their change won't break it.
>>106524052cheap shitskins and AI will ruin everything, mark my words.
>>106524465I dug into a set of repos at work where Claude was being used recently to write tests, and the new tests are complete dogshit. The critical parts of the data ingest validation process that we actually need tests for are just being mocked out instead, and all the tests have ended up has an obfuscated way of performing a "True == True" check.
>>106525348True. The Microsoft CEO statement doesn't make sense at all. Most Microsoft code is probably old shit that nobody dares to touch because it will break. There's no way they would have rewritten 30% of it, even with AI.>>106525408>>106525595Fun. I believe it.
>>106524236>vibe check the vibecodeHorrifying.
huh so that's how all those ssds bricked in an update
>>106524052These dumb assholes used to gatekeep by asking inane bullshit riddles. Look at where we are at now. Fuck you microsoft. Also fuck Microsoft Answers no I will not sfc /scannowhttps://www.amazon.com/How-Would-Move-Mount-Fuji/dp/0316778494
>>106524052Since AI stands for "actually indian", yes it's true at Microshit.
>>106525137Post hands and pay stub
>>106524052Take it with a grain of salt. These numbers are based on reports from employees who were informed that "using AI" is a new KPI. Nobody actually counts anything as it's rather not possible and also you have incentive to report a number that is slightly higher than what the other team reported.t. MS FTE
>>106526722You don't have to tell that to me, but the media who keep repeating it, and the retards who fully believe it.
>>106525518karma
>>106525518Yeah they will control the robots with a joystick and youll be seething.
>>106524052Good to know that pajeets are destroying microsoft from the inside out
>>106524052C#/dotnet is the only microsoft product I use. I don't think you can ai code a compiler or a runtime.
>>106528259C# is their only based product. Azure sucks and Postgres is far superior to SQL server
>>106526474just vibecode a vibe check for the vibe check. simple.
