/g/ - what did flatpak mean by this? - Technology

Anonymous

09/10/25(Wed)01:35:49 No.106543101

File: 1746629930550780.png (246 KB, 813x348)

246 KB PNG

Anonymous 09/10/25(Wed)01:35:49 No.106543101 Archived

what did flatpak mean by this?

Anonymous
09/10/25(Wed)01:36:30 No.106543109

Anonymous 09/10/25(Wed)01:36:30 No.106543109

>>106543101
Don't tell me that drivers are Flatpak'd too?

Anonymous
09/10/25(Wed)01:43:56 No.106543158

Anonymous 09/10/25(Wed)01:43:56 No.106543158

File: 1738035696559181.png (1.08 MB, 1080x1005)

1.08 MB PNG

>>106543109
and its a good thing.

Anonymous
09/10/25(Wed)01:48:03 No.106543182

Anonymous 09/10/25(Wed)01:48:03 No.106543182

What's the matter? Running out of space on your 60GB spinny disk?

Anonymous
09/10/25(Wed)01:51:51 No.106543211

Anonymous 09/10/25(Wed)01:51:51 No.106543211

>>106543101
>23.08
Maybe you shouldn't use obsolete unmaintained software?
And did you expect from backwards compatible solutions? There's a reason why clean Windows 11 and Android take 60GiB of space?

Anonymous
09/10/25(Wed)01:57:46 No.106543255

Anonymous 09/10/25(Wed)01:57:46 No.106543255

202d2d6e6f2d70726573657276652d726f6f74202f

Anonymous
09/10/25(Wed)01:59:11 No.106543271

Anonymous 09/10/25(Wed)01:59:11 No.106543271

>>106543101
It's pythonic

Anonymous
09/10/25(Wed)02:05:17 No.106543312

Anonymous 09/10/25(Wed)02:05:17 No.106543312

>>106543158
Drivers in userspace, sandboxed at that, sounds really dumb to me.

Anonymous
09/10/25(Wed)02:07:40 No.106543333

Anonymous 09/10/25(Wed)02:07:40 No.106543333

>>106543101
I means that different packages are using different versions of dependencies, blame those maintainers for not being up to date. Windows does this for every program.

Anonymous
09/10/25(Wed)02:08:45 No.106543343

Anonymous 09/10/25(Wed)02:08:45 No.106543343

>>106543101
sometimes flatpak is the only choice, honestly appimages are just not intuitive fo me, i don't understand how it makes sense to just place an .appimage somewhere and run it as an appkication, with 0 integration. apt / packages are always the best, but appimages are

Anonymous
09/10/25(Wed)02:14:07 No.106543379

Anonymous 09/10/25(Wed)02:14:07 No.106543379

>>106543343
..appimages are just so, less than basic, don't see any point in them unless you have 0 alternative and need only funcionality

Anonymous
09/10/25(Wed)02:44:14 No.106543591

Anonymous 09/10/25(Wed)02:44:14 No.106543591

>>106543101
ever tried flatpak uninstall --unused ?