Instead of C. No more passing pointers. Everyone thinks of C++ as and OOP language, but it can be used like Clojure without being slow. The truth is C++ wins because it's multi-paradigm. It supports both the OOP retards, and the Pure Function Chads. It's something for everyone.
>>106544416Wow, look at you, Pure Function Chad in C++. I’m shook. Tell me more about how manually managing memory makes you deeply enlightened.
in Rust his is just#[derive(Clone, Copy)]struct Noisy;
#[derive(Clone, Copy)]struct Noisy;
>>106544416>it's another "Language X reinvents Lisp" momentLispfags were right. Once you notice it you just can't stop noticing it.
>>106545714and takes five hours to compile
>>106544416I'll still continue to pass pointers, thanks.
>>106545755Lisp is great but it's so slow. C++ is closest to fast lisp.
>>106546064It's not necessarily though, SBCL is quite fast, and you can also use tricks to modify how things work at a low level. Common Lisp is actually potentially quite fast. Clojure is the one that stands out as being really bad for performance.
>>106546086>Common Lisp is actually potentially quite fast.>yeah just create hardware where that would be true, ez you chud
>>106545714Looks horrible.
>>106546114has nothing to do with hardware, you can even modify the low-level instructions via mop
>>106546086Nothing you write in lisp will be faster than cpp ever.
>>106546257yeah i knowbut its somthing lisprabble likes to say>hurr durr c fucked up architecture for us or somethinga recursive is conceptually slow"fast" lisps turn it into a simili-recursive, dont remember the proper term for that "optimization"
