Is flooding the market with AI slop the best way to make money right now?
>>106551971>People who don't let me be a billionaire for feeding them trash are evil.
>>106551971>If you don't give me a dollar, you're an [insult]!Sounds just like the homeless crackhead harassing people outside the gas station. Is this the power of AI?
>People referring to all Ai content as AI slop are lazy ludditesYes, about as lazy as the people making low quality $1 a day slop.
>>106552103is this a troll?pretty sure it's saying they cost $1 to make a joe rogan esque quality podcast.i have to imagine they're quite good even if it is AI junk. you'd listen to two attractive sounding people discuss whatever autistic niche hobby no one else has heard of for 2,4,8,infinite hours
>>106552124I read it as the consumer would pay $1 to listen to each episode. Either way, they're begging someone (investor or customer) to give them money and trying to browbeat them into it by calling them lazy retards if they don't.
>>106552145thats just marketing brothey need money to get articles written like thisjust like chatGPT did
>>106551971Sure, if you can get VC money. Obviously such horseshit won't actually ever be profitable, but who cares right?
i like the youtube creepypasta slop, but i would never pay for them
>>106551971further proof that the economy isn't real and it's all made up
>>106552238>Obviously such horseshit won't actually ever be profitableI dunno, I think there are a shitload of niches that aren't being served in audio. People have a lot of time to kill and want to listen to stuff.
>>106551971I personally did it with SEO before this yes.We'd hire absolute worst tier SEA people to write in English for semi major websites and we made crazy many off of it until google got wise and this whole AI race started.For 15 years we've been milking the Amazon and other affilate tits and we'll continue.
>>106552321kek remember spinnerchief
>>106552321I am a shameless faggot who has the technical skills to execute on this. Tell me more.
I can't wait for the shitty AI grift to implode. If there's any justice in the world people like this will end up homeless.
Didn't somebody do something similar with music streaming, where they dumped a bunch of AI music and got busted for fraud?
>>106552238People spent tens of dollars per day on coffee, every single day. $1 per day, per podcast is nothing. Hell, spamming $10/day is nothing. 3650 podcast per year. If any of them ever hits mainstream, they can easily get their money back with a single hit.
>>106551971No because it requires no effort or hard work yet people keep shilling it. If making AI slop is profitable then why is your company shilling courses on it instead of just running thousands of accounts automatically.
>>106552124No. I've organically come across AI "podcasts" (it's generally a man and a woman) and it's extremely off putting.Not only by the fact that two people talking about that niche thing would be unusual let alone a woman, but the prose reads like GPT slop.They're extremely enthusiastic and happy about something that it clearly only has surface level of, and love to suck off whoever created that thing they are talking about like their life depended on it. "Ah, those folks at Salesforce, always pushing the boundaries." with a happy voice as if she was talking about her idyllic childhood. It's dystopic really and only the most NPC of the NPCs could enjoy it.
>>106552124>Would you not listen to two LLMs talking about some niche autistic thingNo, I don’t want to hear Wikipedia recap in the LLM verbose babbling way actually. I want to hear what famous people in the title want to say about a topic. If that podcast is made up and it’s just LLM larping as someone I am interested in then I don’t want that. I can also just open Character.ai and as what some LLM thinks famous person Y thinks.
>>106552238>Obviously such horseshit won't actually ever be profitableI've made profit from making AI audios to soothe lonely people. It just comforts them and tells them nice stuff. I don't know if they've already caught on to the voice not being a real woman.
>>106551971>US Female>US Make>UK MaleTTS software limitations. Also, end users rarely pay for podcasts. She has to convince ad buyers to pay.
>>106551971>paying for a podcastpropaganda should be free
>there're retards consuming that slop Finally, the CORN SYRUP for the brain.
>>106552124>you'd listen toI don't though. I have never ``tuned into'' a podcast, ever. 4chan is the closest I come to hearing people's opinion on any subject. I just don't care what the world thinks about itself. I am waiting for the end, which is nigh.
>>106552291they'll monetize with ads like normal podcasts
>>106551971>It's not slop you're just a Luddite!>Floods 3000 hours a week of generated audio slop to podcast platform
>>106552124>a joe rogan esque quality podcast.>i have to imagine they're quite goodYou put as little effort into not coming off like the faggot trying to sell these shitcasts as aisloppers put into creating anything of value.
>>106551971Why would I pay for AI generated sloptent if I can pay to generate it myself?
>>106555537the only issue is the fact that they try to present it as real people, which creates an uncanny valley effect.but i have generated and prompted (i control the direction) the conversation before and listened to hour long discussions of the material. its guaranteed to be valuable just because people like listening to audio, closing their eyes. >>106555552>No, I don’t want to hear Wikipedia recapskill issue. i listened to both of these.
>>106557528>Brain_Hacks__Adapting_Your_Mind_to_AI_for_Smarter_Thinking_and_Stronger_Recall.mp4https://files.catbox.moe/nzuy10.mp4
AI genuinely has no reason to exist and these desperate efforts to make it into a cash cow will get increasingly ridiculous and grotesque really fast.
>>106557528that's notebookllm right? i tried their "podcast" audio format and found it grating.>>106557671I would be OK with quality content that was useful, but generating 3000 a week just means it's slop with no proofreading and probably no listeners.
>>106557724>that's notebookllm right? i tried their "podcast" audio format and found it grating.yeah. theyre adding stuff to it all the time. for example the >>106557565 voices here (Critique mode) are different than the ones you probably heard. it seems completely fine to me, i know its a robot, i dont care, the conversation is good.
>>106551971How much did they pay for this article? Any vibe coder could slap this together in a week. The magic is in the marketing and getting articles like this written so they can get boomer investment money.
>>106551971it's the fastest way to become indian
