https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z7XfS_7pMtY>TV reviewer observes that big budget Hollywood movies are dimmer than they were 10 years ago>200-300 nits max in the full shots of the Sun, basically SDR>This despite paying top dollar for new HDR-capable mastering monitors like the Sony BVM-HX3110 (~4000 nits peak)>This despite consumer TVs themselves never being brighterAlong with the refusal to go above 24fps is there any hope that commercial video will ever improve?
>>106554997>I use RUIPRO HDMI cables!Sorry I only respect the opinions of people who use HDMI cables worth 4 figures.
60 fps movies would be neat but theres the effect of making stuff look faker due to higher clarityhdr is at least happening in video games so peoples oled displays can be used for that
Just play video games.
>>106554997HDR is more about seeing details in the dark shots than about blasting sun into your eyes.Maybe modern movies have more dark shots because they're no longer gray blobs with visible banding?
>>106555423HDR is just metadata that can improve brightness, contrast and colourbanding has nothing to do with sdr or hdralso more than 24fps is retardedhell even 20fps is good enoughOP is a retard and the youtube faggot should kys
>>106555459If you actually save images / videos with a higher bit depth then that will definitely prevent banding. Take a look at RAW, there is no banding present, it is only introduced with 8-bit quantization
>>106555482yes, which has nothing to do with hdr
just use S24 with HDR AMOLED.
>>106555502HDR has multiple meanings, one of which is higher bit depth
>>106555299OLED monitors can't display HDR properly due to ABL
