>>106557769duckling
I drove down into Virginia the other day to pick up a cassette receiver and CD changer for my car and not far from the guy's house I passed a place that had a bunch of tables out front and one of them had a CRT on it with a big sign on the front that said FREE, I told myself if it was still there on my way home I would stop and throw it in the trunk of the car, but by the time I was heading home, I guess they had closed up shop because I didn't even see any tables anywhere let alone the TV :(
>>106557769That thing looks like a fridge
>>106557769why wont people clean their PVMs/CRTs? give it a nice scrub with isopropyl alcohol for fucks sake. do you enjoy having a disgusting and sticky piece of hardware in your house?
>>106557769I had the opportunity to steal some old crts from the e-waste dump last week but I restrained because they're literally garbage
>>106557838>>106557850Pesky little samefag! PESKY! :3Also, that's a cute a ducky! c:
>>106558620quack
trannies ruined retro
trump banned CRT
>>106558589It's SOUL o algo
>>106557769
>>106557769comfy
>>106557769- CRTs are no longer produced because they have inferior picture quality versus LCDs- CRTs emit dangerous levels of X-rays or other forms of radiation- CRTs always have easily-visible flicker- CRTs always cause eyestrain- CRTs always make a high-pitched squealing noise- CRTs contain lethal amounts of electricity, even when unplugged- CRTs need calibration more than two to three times a year- Overall CRT black levels are not superior to LCDs because ambient light ruins CRT black levels- Analog CRTs have more processing time than digital LCDs due to poor RAMDAC performance- Afterimages caused by phosphor decay are extremely annoying and are a significant downside of CRTs- Sending an improper mode (resolution or refresh rate) to a CRT can cause permanent damage- CRTs cannot have touchscreens- 4:3 is so bad that nobody should use a non-widescreen CRT- The Sony GDM-FW900 is the only CRT worth owning- Curved CRTs have objectively inferior picture quality versus flat CRTs with otherwise equal specifications- CRTs should not be used because they are heavier and deeper than LCDs- CRTs have severe reflections because they do not have matte coats- CRTs can be permanently damaged by nearby magnets- Analog signals limit a CRT's resolutions and refresh rates and negatively effect picture quality- Heavy metals are used in CRT glass to reduce radiation
>>106564406yeah but it's comfy
>>106564406Thank you, anongpt.
>>106564406>electrical retardationThe level of misunderstanding of physics/electronics is comical, rolf
>>106565057You zoomers wasn't even around when ppl used crts.
>>106565853I used CRTs when your dad still mowed my lawn, Pablo. Miss that guy.
>>106564406>CRTs cannot have touchscreensThey can and did have IR touchscreens or lightpens> The Sony GDM-FW900 is the only CRT worth owningbullshit>Curved CRTs have objectively inferior picture quality versus flat CRTswrong
If CRTs are so good then why dont you build one?
>>106565981what am I looking at
>>106566002retrotoober called 8bitcuck destroying a CRT of an arcade machine
>>106565853Many zoomers used CRTs. CRTs were still commonplace around the mid to late 2000s. LCDs took over fast, with geometry and resolution being their only positive aspects circa '04. "Flat screen" was the marketing buzzword. CRTs stopped being manufactured late '09, but sales continued into the early 2010s in developing countries like India. The CRT died out much faster in HICs like US or UK, getting sales overtook by LCDs in '05. Then the financial crisis happened and Cannon would have been memed at if they released expensive SED displays. Allegedly, SEDs were used as broadcast monitors in Japan.https://spectrum.ieee.org/goodbye-crthttps://www.wired.com/2002/01/a-flat-flat-flat-screen-world/
Too much power consumption.Send them all to landfills.
I need advice on getting CRTs
>>106565931>onions>trinitroon
>CRT Thread
>>106564406Other than a few retards in these threads, nobody actually believes they were superior in any way, other than maybe brightness. They are only good for nostalgia and some retro games built for CRT looks better on CRT.
>>106566344Ignore listings >$100 for a monitor, unless new-old stock. High end CRT monitors go for around $60. Monitors are a completely different IQ class to TVs. For TVs: RGB SCART is a big IQ upgrade to S-video. Component = RGB only Scart >>> Scart > S-video >> Composite
>>106566544
>>106566549How much are FW900?
>>106566582Utterly ridiculous prices, anon. $1000+. I would say the best CRT monitor ever was the Mitsubishi 2070SB either way. 140KHz horizontal scan out, verus 121KHz on FW900.
Nobody trashing CRT's has any business calling himself white.
>>106566549I mean, where and how to look for them? Anwlyways thanks for the input ranking.Also wondering if a CRT is usable if the screen got splashed with bleach?
>>106566620Most high quality monitors I see are already over $1000, and I saw once FW900 that was about $4000. I've not seen one CRT monitor of that quality that was under $1000, and the shitty CRT monitors cost like $300 at least.Where do you find CRT monitors that aren't ridiculous prices? I can't even find them on side walks anymore.
>>106566670>Also wondering if a CRT is usable if the screen got splashed with bleach?Not a problem. If you get any discoloration, that's calling for degaussing.
>>106566692>that's calling for degaussing.I mean the screen, not the whole thing.
>>106557783cuckling^
>>106566703There's nothing bleach can do if splashed on glass. Not gonna do shit to a crt display.If it hit the yoke or anything electronic, that's another story.
My main nigga
>>106566735What to do if it has geometry issues?
>>106566753Depends on the exact symptoms. Some stuff takes fiddling with knobs, other replacing components.
>>106566670Facebook marketplace tend to be good for free TVs. Use picclick.co.uk to search eBay listings better. I got my CRT monitors from a textiles company that went bust and liquidated all assets, years ago for cheap. Call up any old graphic design, textiles or printing companies in your area, and ask if they have high end colour CRT monitors willing to give for free (or sell for a small price). I missed the chance to get a Iiyama Vision Master 505, and a LaCie Electron 22 Blue II.Japanese engineers were and still are semiconductor gods, the fastest CRT, 2070SB, used a Toshiba 2SC5570 HOT: a triple diffusion NPN BJT. There exist no transistors to this day that can handle the stress of being the horizontal output transistor in these CRTs. HOTs haven't been made in nearly 2 decades.
>>106566620>the best CRT monitor ever was the Mitsubishi 2070SB either way.Nah. 2070SB was budget trash even compared to the CPD-G520's. Virtually all of them suffer from bad linearity and geometry.It's the Sony GDM-F520 that is the best CRT ever made, the only (relevant) .22mm aperture grille there is.
>>106557769Anyone got info on repair/maintenance? I recently got a Viewsonic that zooms in and out (accompanied by a "click" sound) often. It doesn't look like any of the caps are leaking or swelling
>>106566737Whats the white square on these?
>>106566870GDM G520 was definitely sharper, was it not the only 0.22mm aperture grille CRT? The 2070SB did scan slightly faster at 140KHz vs 130KHz with the G520. Those linearity and geometry issues about the late mitsubishi monitors are true, though some of them were fine. The SMPTE-C phosphors used by Sony have just slightly less saturation / smaller colour gamut than the regular P22 phosphors that cover the whole sRGB / BT 709 colour gamut.
>>106566984Most everything I know about crt repairing I learned from Randy Fromm back in the 90's.https://www.youtube.com/@randyfromm/videosLook for the 3 video series called "Classic Raster Scan Monitor Repair". Absolute gold.
>>106567009
https://www.repairfaq.org/sam/crtfaq.htm
>>106566984Common fault, but precise cause not known. Typically it'll only get worse and worse until the monitor completely kills itself. Something is arcing or shorting somewhere, but internet is full of nonsense information about what and if anything can be done about it. The only solid first-hand knowledge I have is that on a CPD-G400, the arc happened inside a spark gap overvoltage protection device. The best thing you can do is dust the insides and hope the monitor doesn't die too soon.>>106567013>as it not the only 0.22mm aperture grille CRT?There were 4 .22mm monitors, at least in theory>GDM-F400, 19">GDM-F420, 21" 121khz>GDM-F500, 19" (doesn't actually exist)>GDM-F520, 21" 137khz>The 2070SB did scan slightly faster at 140KHz vs 130KHz with the G520.The G520's can be overclocked, I've heard people running them at 150khz>The SMPTE-C phosphors used by Sony have just slightly less saturation / smaller colour gamut than the regular P22 phosphors that cover the whole sRGB / BT 709 colour gamut.G520 nor F520 use SMPTE-C phosphor. They're both regular old P22.
>>106567013Also P22 doesn't cover sRGB, P22 CRTs are always short when it comes to red saturation.
>>106567064I mixed up GDM-F500 and GDM-F420 there*
>>106567064>The G520's can be overclocked, I've heard people running them at 150khzThat is very impressive, given the secondary breakdown effects associated with switching BJTs at their limit at high collector currents.>G520 nor F520 use SMPTE-C phosphor. They're both regular old P22.I now agree in all aspects, the SONY GDM G520 was the best monitor ever made.>>106567084> Also P22 doesn't cover sRGB, P22 CRTs are always short when it comes to red saturation.I think I was wrong about SMPTE-C phosphors... I am not sure anymore on their spectral distribution used in other CRTs. I think P22 isn't any specific phosphor, now that I recall, it is just a generic family of phosphors used in CRTs.
>>106567167>it is just a generic family of phosphors used in CRTs.Correct, different P22 CRTs have wildly different gamuts and persistence. Most high end monitors have a rather similar gamut though, sRGB-like volume but all primaries shifted away from red. There was a monitor that did have a gamut above the rest, Mitsubishi RDF225WG. It had something approximating NTSC gamut, and had 140khz. But it's famous for it's green trailing.
>>106567051>>106567019It looks great, thanks>>106567064>Typically it'll only get worse and worse until the monitor completely kills itself. >The best thing you can do is dust the insides and hope the monitor doesn't die too soon.Fuck, I guess I'll enjoy it while it lasts
>>106567318Anything on a rgb crt is fixable save for super worn out phosphors, loss of vacuum due to cracking and warped masks/grills.
The funniest thing about CRT threads is when people share photos of CRTs, on their LCD screens, to prove how great CRTs are
>>106567418If you have an oscilloscope and are comfortable poking a live CRT with it, sure. This is a fault we don't have any solid understanding of.
>>106567218Very interesting, thanks. It does make sense why most monitors look similar, given their phosphors are usually all sulfides of zinc, doped with other compounds to get the different colours. My Mitsubishi NSH1157STTUW uses B22 EBU phosphors. I haven't yet come across a service manual that specifies the exact composition.
>>106567498Can't be worse than tech npc's and their garbage crt shaders.
>>106567529it's a thronritter80 thread so yes
>>106565931>They can and did have IR touchscreens or lightpensMost inconvenient shit ever, who wants to draw digital art on a 15 inch high box on your desk?
>>106567544Musicians
>>106567516I'd say yes to both. CRT's aren't as dangerous as some people believe, discharged or live. Just be careful as with anything else.
>>106567561Funny thing, you can simulate much of the inner works of a crt by timing the use of every pixel individually (required for lightpen interfacing) and it wouldn't be expensive or particularly complicated, but nobody does it anymore because it's an extra thing offering little to zero value to a 2025 normie monitor buyer.
>>106567671old.reddit.com
damn, someone's seething about being to poor to even buy discarded CRT's LOL!!
>>106557769>want crt>start networking with the local thrift store>they start giving me free computers and crts>oh but these r garbage i want a GOOD crt>join local computer hobby club>every month someone brings in a crt and gives it out for free cause these dudes have like 100s of them in their basements
>>106567667There is the free CRT Beam emulator by Blur Busters, running on shaders. It does greatly improve motion clarity on OLEDs, but it needs a lot of raw Hz, at least 500Hz, to be almost comparable in motion clarity to a CRT. This software approach to emulating the raster has downsides though - the perceived flicker is stronger than on a CRT at any FPS greater than 50Hz, and luminance is reduced significantly, though with HDR on OLEDs, this can be mitigated. Ideally monitor manufacturers would implement this with a user-tunable interface, but none of them know about these advancements or even care to implement them if they did know. Since CRTs won't ever be produced again, the beam emulator is a sort software preservation effort for CRTs.
>>106557769>CRT Threaddo you faggots enjoy the radiation tan and dry eyes from your CRT? I don't miss it.
>CRT thread
>>106567837I think WinUAE races the beam too, but it's a half-assed solution that's not really practical on standard poverty panels. You can only draw stuff in chunks. Pixel precision obviously is not workable.
CRTroons are some of the worst posters on this entire board, almost as bad as the Indians who hate on Apple all day.
>>106568040>everyone I don't like is an IndianApple is for airheads who don't have common sense
>>106568049You could just say you’re poor.
>>106567969>not really practical on standard poverty panelsTrue, 1000Hz OLED will be very expensive, but more Hz will work better at racing the beam in emulators. 500Hz OLED is around $900, currently.
>>106568077I'm not poor, I just spend my money wisely.
>be german physicist Karl Ferdinand Braun>invent CRT in 1897>few decades pass, video camera tube gets invented by Farnsworth, based on CRTs>TV revolutionises communication and art in the whole world>...>invention dies to shitty, cheap LCD after over 100 years of developmentCRT manufacturing was a fucking art.It was a mistake to completely abandon this technology.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_jt1qPTQYNEhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qKoBELzpwQIhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=byCeMKzPJgMhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_Q5bEGikmNQ
>>106568475You look to the past instead of the future.
>>106568475Grow up, it's so cringe.
>>106569087I am looking forward to PH-OLED and uLED in the future, but CRTs did not deserve to be abandoned. They still are the closest thing to an ideal monitor, temporally, in existence. LCD TN panels survived and they are crap in all metrics.>>106569186Name a single display technology that has pixel response times of sub 200 nanoseconds or better from a 255-127 white-grey transition. Name a single fancy gaming monitor with an input latency of less than 29 nanoseconds. You read that right. NANOSECONDS. 10^-9s. OLED pixel response time on average is nearly an order of magnitude slower. LCD is nearly 2 orders of magnitude slower.
>>106569244Name a person that can tell the difference.
>>106569260>picrel OLED at 480Hz>numbers are still blurry.Anyone can tell the difference in motion clarity. In terms of input latency, the fastest gaming monitor currently in production has about 1.8milliseconds input delay (due digital processing and passive matrix to work the OLEDs), but the difference is just noticeable.
>Same panel at 120Hz
>>106557769Is the reason why things like Retroarch have a billion different type of scanline filters because of various CRT models?
>>106569244>You read that right. NANOSECONDS. 10^-9s.
>>106569389The main reason is autism
>>106569458they all look bad fr breh
>>106564406Zoom zoom cope
>>106569438All you are capable of responding with is a silly image.
>>106569458On a bright OLED and from a distance, this is actually closer: https://files.catbox.moe/n6h1rt.png
>>106569828I'm older than you.
>crt tv>cathode ray television television
>>106571789The brainlet NPC normalfag in the meme you posted is very much you.
>>106571789>cathode ray television monitor
>>106571789>critical race theory televisionso just normal television?
>>106571789Cathode Ray Tube
Almost every thread that has any relation to the past is overrun by petty post that wants to pretend that everything that has 2 digit number as an age is somehow bad as if anyone cares if it's dated or not, like when was the last good retro thread...2018? 2019?I really like how retarded zoomies have hijacked this site
>>106566344Look for old grannies in your areaThey sell it dirt cheap and give you free cookies as well
>>106571732Then you were one of the many that fell for the LCD monitor marketing in the early 2000s, putting everyone through a fifteen year long dark age, were LCDs with retarded sloth levels of response times quickly turned into the only option. 15 years of using 'flat screen' low contrast LCDs meant for office use. LCDs had higher resolution, better geometry and lasted longer, but their usecases were in offices. At least we have OLED now - but it is 2025, and there is still no technology that matches CRTs in pixel response times and input delay.
>>106564406 >not owning a LACIE electron22blueIIIIt's like you don't even into premium retro shit.
>>106564406>Overall CRT black levels are not superior to LCDs because ambient light ruins CRT black levelsMy Apple Studio Display 17'' has better blacks than your oled fyi. Won't even bother addressing the rest.
>>106566549you will never find a sb2070 for $60
>>106572778I didn't fall for any marketing, I had a CRT monitor until about 2007 when I just couldn't put up with them anymore, how heavy they were, how much space they took up, they were inconvenient and they always had issues like burn in and flickering. I went out and got an LCD then threw out the CRT on the sidewalk.
>>106572838Prove it.protip: you won't
>>1065659818bit fucktard does it again
>>106572845I found two LaCie Electron 22 blue II for £60, the other £110.At the same place, there was also a Iiyama Vision Master Pro 454 for £55 and Mitsubishi 93SB for £60.This was a couple years ago, though. I got the LaCie and 93SB.
I threw away my 2 CRT monitors since the top of the image was bent inside on the 2 of them. Did I do okay?
>>106572955Flicker is not perceived at 73Hz or above, on CRT monitors with medium persistence phosphors (most monitors). Phosphor burn-in also is not an issue using X11 windows or any graphical Windows(tm) shell. Phosphor half-life is about twice that of OLEDs at 100 nits luminance, though most do not use their OLED monitors that dim, instead typically more around 200nits, halving longevity. That makes OLEDs 3-4x more burn-in susceptible under typical usage, than phosphors on CRTs.
>>106557769caturday
>>106575679This looks like an uncanny image taken away from my teens except more comfy plus a neko fren
>>106572845I got a pair of them for free about ten years ago, sitting on a pallet with other junk. Gave one away to another retro guy and have mine sitting in the other room.
>>106557769>Just got.>I'm a gaymen whore, currently DP to VGA adapter stuck at 60Hz. Can I go beyond this meagre refresh rate? Legit feels more responsive than my 144Hz LCD.>Feels right.
My CRT is shit so the novelty wore off quickly
>>106577041I own this monitor :) greatest display ever made
>>1065770411800x1350 native resolution on a CRT is fucking insane for 2001. Also 137KHz scan rate is very fast too. Anyone remember what this monitor retailed for? €900?
>>106578004No it wasn't.
>>106578004$1,600.
>>106566870Go back to grooming teenagers on matrix fingol
>>106578360Are you encouraging pedophilia?
>>106578477No, but it's fingol's favourite pastime.
>>106578640Then take an english class or something.You're like a retarded keyboard autocomplete that mashes together frequently seen meme phrases from the internet into barely coherent sentences with completely unintended meanings.
>>106578670Not my fault you're too braindead to understand.
>>106566440kek CRTroons BTFO
>>106578820Your shitty picture was debunked in the thread it was posted to first. Stop replying to yourself.
>>106578789I don't owe you the service of reinterpreting your 80iq ESL drivel to the meaning you vaguely had in your tiny head.
>>106578918I shouldn't have to spell it out loud so that it gets through your thick skull, retard-kun. Now, if you would please stop shifting the blame onto me for your subpar comprehension skills.
>>106579082Do you seriously think I didn't understand what you meant? I'm making fun of your troglodyte zoomer memeslop ESL english
>>106579102Retards like you operate in mysterious ways.>I'm making fun of your troglodyte zoomer memeslop ESL english>t. uses three modern internet neologisms in a row in a single sentence
>>106579136I think I'm really talking to some kind of low-grade LLM with a context window of around a post or two. My whole issue was that you used meme language in a context it didn't fit, creating a meaning you didn't whatsoever intend. OP I've seen you post before and how pathetic your language skills are cracks me up every time. You don't really understand the text you write or read, it's genuinely fascinating. Exactly like a lobotomized LLM.
>>106579196He's going to reply to this with something that looks like a reply, but doesn't actually address any points of the discussion. The post will appear completely unaware of any posts past the one he's currently replying to.
>>106579196The grate white spark spotted timely before the demise of the bottled neck CPU water with jews at the helm.Sunk, cost facility.
>>106569389None of the people who make those filters have a crt.
>>106557769RANFAG THREADDNI
>>106569244> I am looking forward to PH-OLED and uLEDThey will be the same old sample and hold trash. The sad thing is, manufacturers could make an OLED monitor with CRT motion clarity right now. But they never will.
>>106580964https://patents.google.com/patent/US10395590B1/en
>>106565981oopslmaooooooooooo
>>106566191Is PDP plasma?I actually bought one in like 2004ishI thought they were neat. But they didn't take off.
>>106581196>picrel shows colour fidelity index of various display technologies, measured with spectrometer>https://www.avsforum.com/threads/the-real-reason-why-colors-looks-better-on-plasma-and-crt-tvs-compared-to-led-tvs-of-today.3322381/>CFI compares a source's colour rendering to that of natural light (from a blackbody emitter like the Sun or incandescent bulb)Yes, plasma panels had excellent image quality, they are still the holy grail TV tech for AV enthusiasts. PDPs were very expensive when they came to market around 2003. By 2009 they were nearly the same price as the LCD panels. Still, few were buying plasma. The holy grail PDP was a THX certified 42" 1080p Panasonic. PDPs had higher power consumption, but still had CRT-like image quality (used different phosphors to emit light), with much less glass blooming at higher luminance. CRT and PDP are still the kings at rendering skin tones and colours due to the emission spectra of the phosphors, compared to LED backlit displays and OLEDs/quantum dots. That is one of the reasons AV enthusiasts love PDP and CRTs.
i remember watching the hanging of sadam hussein live on a CRT TV. Also in elementry school my neighbor was also my teacher and she brought in a CRT TV on some tall wheel thing and we watched planes crash into skyscrappers and then we were let home earlyOh, and a lot of Zena warrior princess saved on VHS tapes
>>106582122Why 3 mice WTF
>>106579196>llm calling others llm — peak schizophrenia
>F520 tranny is backSorry, the cummon consesus is that Diamondtrons and especially NF Diamondtrons are the best nowadaysWhich I have been saying for yearsAnd also Lukes 2070SB has better geometry then your F520 lol
PVMs look cool>>106579196no, I know you are talking to a real person, I recognize the pattern I know who it is lolYou are just too stupid to recognize his pattern matrix trannyAlso I didnt argue with you, I forgot about this thread untill nowSo you cant even tell when its me>>106579262Shield me from sorrowFrom fear of tommorowhelp me faith
>>106566571sean didnt fall off his chair in inebrieation, he fell off at sheer rage for the NINTENDO SHITCUBE and its incompatibility with even then-modern flatscreen displays
>>106583520that looks like shit.>>106582307>AV enthusiastsdont you have some 17,000$ ceramic disks to buy to keep your cables off the floor?
>>106564406crt trannies are indeed retarded but>- CRTs are no longer producedincorrect, you can find new model CRTs for industrial environments and certain commercial applications>- CRTs emit dangerous levels of X-rays or other forms of radiationno they dont, it's non-ionizing radiation>- CRTs cannot have touchscreensnot a real use case but also they can, the "touch" part of a touchscreen is an extra layer applied over top>- Heavy metals are used in CRT glass to reduce radiationno theyre not, they use borosilicate glass, not lead glass
>>106565981KEK!
>>106566344rob a Super Smash Bros player
To buy a quality CRT just to display some retarded manchild faggit cartoon is the ultimate travesty.
>>106583811Don't be too upset,, OP doesn't own anything actually valuable
>>106583811its just a PVMit would have went into the trash if i didnt take it>>106583903holy copewhat do (you) have?
>>106557769Does anyone have a good test image suite that can be burned to a DVD?
>>106582509Was she hot?>>106583520Where do you buy these in Australia without them being over $1000?
>>106584037look at e waste disposal sitescould get lucky yes that means physically going there and searching
>>106583980I feel sorry for the 2060u. It has found a miserable end.
>>106584004If you mean specifically for calibration, no idea (other than Marcie, which's like a 50-something MiB download if you can find it), but these are relly nice test images for other purposes: https://r0k.us/graphics/kodak/If you get the .PCD's, they can be decoded at much nigher resolutions than what was used for the .PNG's.
>>106584121If CRTs are so good and valuable why do no CRT owners fucking clean them once in a while?
>>106584163It's just OP aka ranfag aka /u/thronritter80, his degeneracy and lolcowing drove off all the actual CRT enthusiasts off the board.
>>106584163Because plenty of them are favored by non-functional adults, as noted above.
>>106584141It is appreciated But I will keep using my Phillips 201P as a main CRTIts amazing >>106584163I cleaned this PVM yesterday tf you mean?
>>106579196You're such an autist lmao. It would do you well to go outside for once and talk to real people, maybe then you'd learn how communication works.
>>106584121Yeah, I checked bunnings and harvey norman but there was nothing. Might have to end up looking around some actual land fills and hopefully not get caught grabbing anything.
>>106584180inaccurate.Whining posts about me loke this/sabotaging threads is what made people fuck off
>>106584227Yeah guess who is sabotaging your threadsThe old CRT regulars you fucking moron
>>106582122>>106582783Germanischen Autismus.Warum seid ihr alle so?>>106584209>I cleaned thisNigger you live in a fucking pig sty hovel. Clean your room your fucking man child. You have a FOOD BOWL IN YOUR BED you disgusting fat fuck. It's not only the fact that you just left it there, but that you're such a disgusting fat hedonistic creature that you eat in your bed.I'm almost inclined to believe I'm falling for bait. Are you hosing down the wall with your cum above your radiator? Jesus Christ, what the fuck is wrong with you. I pray to God we're not the same ethnicity.
>>106584280He is an unironic bottle pee-er. He's one of these 1-in-a-million troglodytes that deserves a kiwifarms thread.
>>106584280This anon is not a man, being that concerned about cleanliness lmao.
>>106584301>>106584209>>106584121>>106583980imma be real and say my house is no better (probably worse actually) but i dont take photos of it proudly, i normally hide the way i live. i dont even see any cigarettes yet there's what looks like ash/cigarette burns everywhere, is that all just rotted juice and insect droppings??
>>106584301he needs a gf
>>106584301>electric anal thermometer with no cover no the deskGAH
>>106584240Every knowledgeable person is on discord nowIt was found out that you can universally swap shadow mask crts aslong as the deflection angel matches therereliable help for repairs is there>sabotaging You only ever sabotaged yourself
>>1065660028bit retar did the thing agian
>>106584354nah its cigsgotta clean em up at some point
you may not like it, but this is what peak desktop is
>>106584408Stop smoking near your CRTs and smoke outside, in fact stop smoking completely.
>smokes and bleeds on they/theirs CRTsIt's like he's trying disrespect the hobby and the technology as much as they/them can
>>106578839>I-It was debunked! You're samefagging!!!You did not debunk me but you did reveal just how deluded you CRT troons really are
>>106584408>>106584428switch to vaping, it's much easier to clean up
>>106584302If your definition of masculinity is how much you live like an African villager, then you are fatherless and your male role models (if they existed) failed you.
>>106584465Men aren't that concerned about shit like that, lmao white boys are so effeminate now. Pathetic, no wonder your race is dying out and being replaced.
>>106584434I have again>>106584448I am actively using them atleast kek
>>106584448Did he cum blood?
