[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/g/ - Technology


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


apologize
>>
I don't like vertical tabs
>>
>>106566032
been daily driving this dogshit for about half a year now. Not as polished as arc, firefox, or many chromium-based shits. Strange little bugs or UX choices abundant. Only reason I havent swapped to something else is because im too lazy. I guess that's a testament to its base "usability" or perhaps tolerability. Probably will switch soon though. Name is cringe; design is kinda gay. Vertical tabs as a concept is good. This is an okay take on it.
>>
>>106566170
Had the same opinion. Tried it for a week and now I cannot go back to horizontal tabs. Its goated.
>>
File: Icecat1-300x300.svg.png (178 KB, 1200x1200)
178 KB
178 KB PNG
>>106566032
no
>>
>>106568121
>deletes your config
T-thx gnu icecat...
>>
File: 1746067255216347.jpg (700 KB, 1264x1788)
700 KB
700 KB JPG
>>106566032
Yeah it's alright I guess. Been using it for a few months now
>>
>>106566032
>apologize
for what?
another pointless chromium fork? with garbage gimmicks that can already be done in existing browsers
>>
>>106568084
I feel the same way. Work in UX professionally and I can't tolerate how unfinished Zen feels. Arc is gay but at least it looks good.
>>
>>106568555
trips of truth
/thread
>>
>>106568611
It's not the truth, it's not a chromium fork
>>
>>106568555
God I fucking wish it was at least built on Chromium.
>>
>>106568555
even worse it's a firefox fork kek
>>
>>106566032
it's shit, it was good initially but turned into the slowest buggiest FF fork ever, had to ditch it at the end
>>
>>106568092
I started trying it earlier today, and I'm surprised how nice it feels in favicon-only mode.
I do wish firefox had a "click on empty area to expand" mode though. I just don't like expand on hover.
>>
>>106568908
Was wondering why it felt so much worse last time I tried it. The fuck happened?
>>
>>106568955
No clue, it started good, it was fast, bugs resolved in a day or two after I report them, and was lightweight.
Now, slow, feels heavy, and bugs never resolved and get locked immediately, there's a bug about pinned tab not being pinned and till now it's not resolved. Went back to librewolf on linux and waterfox on windows.
>>
Bleh, at least it's not fucking brave, lmao.
>>
>>106568600
>works in UX
UX people are the reason UI/UX nowadays is garbage
whatever opinion you have on UI is trash
>>
>>106566170
I tried them with extensions (before there was any native in any browser) like 4-6 times before I couldn't live without them.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.