[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/g/ - Technology


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: img_1_1710751150335.jpg (32 KB, 596x900)
32 KB
32 KB JPG
If a software incorporate a sophisticated AI (trained on all internet data, similar as AGI) and its source code is freely available, is it considered freedom software?
>>
The Free Software Foundation is currently debating this. I think in general, it's hard to defend them as really free unless all training data is released.
>>
>>106567668
>trained on all internet data
The problem is, you don't know that, do you? The model could have all kinds of hidden biases and agendas introduced by training on a carefully doctored dataset.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.