armsissies....
>>106573026ARM is the future.
>>106573033ARM is the future.of trash.
>>106573026phones are now faster than some mid range laptops
>>106573052phones got 10GB of RAM
>>106573033future of kiked (((smart))) devices that will cuck the user into oblivion.
>>106573062MacBook performance destroys any other laptop on the market.
Every wojak poster will be casted from the pearly gates when the time comes, after being personally skinned alive with saint Peter's rusty key
>>106573026It wasn't originally a RISC core. The 8086-386 was actually a cisc processor.
>>106573740I'm sorry, what I meant was 8086 all the way until Pentium Pro (P6) was CISC.
>>106573052try running that phone at full load and enjoy your 30 minute battery
>>106573069no it doesn't
>>106573033Same thing I heard 40 years ago.
>>106573052>Windows 10/11 is so heavy that phones are now faster than some mid range laptopsfixed
>>106573740It's a CISC processor, it doesn't matter if it uses a RISC interpreter under the hood the only important thing is the number of instructions and yes, modern ARM is not RISC either.
Waiting for RISC-V to git gud
>>106574576at it's core it's RISC you may argue that old ARM with it's Thumb mode fuckery isn't RISC either
>>106574606RISC vs CISC is false dichotomy.
>>106573026x86 in laptops are always shit no matter how much amd or intel improoves them, their architecture is just not for laptops or anything that runs on battery. I'm tired of paying 1000$ for a so called high tech laptop just to burn my lap and die in 2 hours. Theres a reason everyone buys a macbook nowadays cause there is not proper alternative
The only difference in RISC vs CISC is that CISC allows memory operands in data processing instructions, and guess what was added in Armv8.1?CISC won.
>>106573753Until 386 as pure CISC, 486 and P5 had some modifications AFAIK and with the introduction of P6/Pentium Pro/K5, x86 is a CISC-on-RISC.>Post 1980s RISC is far more advanced than the original true RISC, and a lot of companies were adapting advanced RISC designs to interpret more complex instructions like x86, that's why there were a lot of x86 'clones' during the late 1990s.
>>106573026Your move x86issies
>>106574813>Useless rock tied to apple hardware and locked down by a shitty OSYou aren't even playing the game
>>106574813>a microarch designed to be balanced between TDP, single core, multi core performance and cost isn't the best in single coreNo shit! too bad Apple can't interconnect their cores properly to scale performance because their designs are unbalanced.https://www.cpubenchmark.net/cpu.php?cpu=Apple+M3+Ultra+28+Core&id=6569https://www.cpubenchmark.net/cpu.php?cpu=AMD+Ryzen+9+9950X3D&id=6549>16 beating 28 cores even if the apple cores have better ST performance
>>106574879>>106574822kek
>>106574822>>106574879>lose in single core to a phone lol >win in multicope lol k
>>106574917>Quasimodo briefly outperforms a balanced cpu in a synthetic benchmark that last half a second to not activate thermal throttling
>>106574917>can't run more than one program at a time>can't compile code>can't run unapproved softwareUseless to all non iToddlers
x86 getting its ass kicked by a phone lmao >ADD MORE CORES>ADD MORE COPES>ADD MORE ROPESkeklosing to arm phone cores crazy shit lmao
Boosting tf out your phone for half a seconds seems to be really effective to get free publicity from iToodlers*2 months afterwards new update underclocks the phone to hide battery wear*
