What about Win 10, they are going to support that?

>>106574255
At this point would not just be better for everyone if they took the patches that Chinese guy made for later Firefox versions to move everyone to a newer ESR?

>>106574284
No. 10 has been dropped due to low user counts.
Everybody with a brain still uses 7 or 8.1.

>>106574349
It's time for your meds.

>>106574255
Windows 8.1 and Windows 10 are the same under the hood, how do you "stop" supporting these older versions of Windows exactly?

>>106575881
that's not true, 8.1 has more in common with 7

>>106574255
You don't even need main firefox really. r3dfox and supermium will do just fine. And even if mozilla drops support for 7, vxkex still works. If XPGODS can use up to doot firefox with one core api, so can we.

>>106575881
>Windows 8.1 and Windows 10 are the same under the hood
completely false

It won't be for much longer, Microsoft released a new Visual Studio that only compiles Windows 10+ .exes, so the remaining apps that support Windows 7 will be forced to drop it.

Firefox is considering dropping legacy processor support soon as well, have dropped 32-bit Linux, 32-bit Windows will happen too as well. Enjoy your Windows 7 ESR while it lasts, as Firefox is moving to becoming modernslop to keep up all the features Google is putting into HTML and Javascript to support AI features.

https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1984610

I installed Ungoogled Chromium at my folks and that shit still works for everything even though there hasn't been a Win7 build out in years. All this "muh browser support" is pure faggotry and nigger iq.

>>106576915
This will be the true death blow.