Should I prioritize space or quality while I'm archiving things on the Internet?
get more storage and do both?
>>106608485qualityso make sure not to include 4chan
>>106608491>>106608500this. but if you're prioritizing certain things over others, MAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAYBE you can sacrifice a bit of quality. idk.
Yes.
>>106608485quality
>>106608485quality, no question
>>106608485this week, i wanted to download a couple old games made for phones, they were in the j2me formatthere are usually about 20 different hashes of files for the same* game, and these were in 80gb+ archivesthe files were usually around 100-200kb a piece, so navigating these archives through archive.org took multiple hours to render all the hyperlinks to the files in the browseryou really don't need to archive by quantityyou don't need that, nobody needs that*while the game title was the same, because of different spec phones there were different resolutions they would try to render in, or different art assets, or different music, or language packs, or the distributor's logo, etc
>>106608485Let it die.
>>106608485The computer can improve space later, but it can't improve quality without you verifying the results.
>>106608485Quality. Then use WinRAR with recovery record.
>>106609325AI can upscale content and it will be better in the future.
