Which programming language has the least amount of jeets and trannies?
>>106630971scratch
>>106630971Forth.
>>106630971Relatively or absolutely?
>>106630971Fortran. Ironically is not for trans.
>>106630971Seems like a silly premise, but> https://www.buildyourownlisp.com/
>>106630971>Haskell>he doesn't know
>>106630971>programming language>few jeets and troonskek
>>106630971mineyou can make your own too. if you do nothing to evangelize it, no man nor jeet may find it.add stupid features. it's fun
>>106630971Common Lisp and Scheme.
>>106631287common lisp is just worse scheme. i would image jeets flocking to the objectively worse dialect. (funcall #'saar '(shrijram sharjizz dikphart))
>>106631346Jeets already flock to Clojure.Common Lisp and Scheme are both invisible to them because they don't have hip buzzwords or colorful startups.
>>106630971jeets and trannies are each other's antithesis, a language with few jeets is bound to have many trannies and vice versa
>>106631416to be fair to clojure it is far more similar to scheme than any other lisp dialect. jeets would never use it too because of the learning curve.
>>106631439Yeah fair, you are probably right.I should've said "if anything, they would go with Clojure, because Java"
>>106630971indians and transexuals dont scare me
>>106630971Language that doesn't have jeets will have trannies and language that doesn't have trannies will have jeets. It's the Law of Equivalent Exchange.
>>106630971Unironically the jeets are getting into haskell and Rust now. Many such cases at my office.
you stop being a jeet when you learn Clojure or Haskell so it's fine
Any old language like APL FORTH LISP or FORTRAN
>>106630971>haskell is most perfomant sir https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aJvwORrBJ0oc or go
>>106633428nah you don't want to do this, I started programming with haskel, then moved to J and BQN before landing on c. The problem with functional languages is that data is what makes abstractions efficient without statistical analysis and fine grain control over your data you lose much of the power. Simple algorithms + the right data structure = happy programmer. Literally anything that gets in the way of the programmer defining their own structs must be a huge win or else you are just poorly simulating the right structure for the job. Array languages you better be damn sure you are only working with arraysADT languages you better be proving your program correct, otherwise you're just larping for zero gain.Dynamic languages you better be sure your boyfriend lubing your asshole
>>106633892non sequitur
>>106633907fallacy fallacy
>>106631416>Jeets already flock to Clojure.>Common Lisp and Scheme are both invisible to them because they don't have hip buzzwords or colorful startups.Totally true. But Scheme is a trannies' favorite, so that only leaves Common Lisp as the heterosexual causcasians' lang.
>>106633914did you even read the op
>>106631007Only jobs with fortran are scientific on super computers tho.
>>106633931I was agreeing, C is an old language. Happiness is the end goal. The number of trannies and jeets is relatively constant outside java and rust, if anything I would expect more trannies in old languages, especially APL, FORTH and LISP. FORTRAN is probably the best language you could pick from those 4 but it's not good for systems programming. C is relatively clean from subhumans outside of introductory material and the standards committee.
>>106630971>Which programming language has the least amount of jeets and trannies?<--- Please refer to the Gartner quadrant on language alignment to get the exact answer to this very important question.
>>106633995>but it's not good for systems programming.You're talking exactly like a Rustrannian.
>>106631346>common lisp is just worse scheme.>(funcall #'saar '(shrijram sharjizz dikphart))tranny detectedand you're example is just refactured to (saar '(whatever)), don't be silly
>>106634013I've seen way more trannies program assembly than scheme, ruby, haskell, smalltalk etc
>>106634020Fortran was quite literally designed for writing applications, specifically implementing numerical algorithms. There are exactly 0 operating systems written in Fortran
>>106630971CL Ocaml, SML/NJ [open]Dylanf*lean
>>106630971How the fuck would we know or care?
>>10663401350% of assembly devs are trans, and 90% of emulator devs.Clojure is much lower on the jeet axis, and less tranny-infested than Lisp.
>>106634119>CL>Ocaml, SML/NJ>[open]Dylan>f*>lean/thread
>>106634191>50% of assembly devs are trans, and 90% of emulator devs.>Clojure is much lower on the jeet axis, and less tranny-infested than Lisp.Thanks for your feedback sir<--------- New version
>>106630971Holy C
>>106634357Based Erlang.
>>106634501>Based Erlang."hello joe... "
>>106630971C++
Ada
>>106633995C was the first tranny language.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mary_Ann_Horton>Horton successfully requested the first transgender-inclusive language added to the Equal Employment Policy in a large American company, and championed the language and insurance coverage of transgender health benefits at other companies.[4]>Horton is a computer scientist and a transgender educator and activist.>In 1981, Horton became a Member of Technical Staff of Bell Labs in Columbus, Ohio. At Bell Labs she brought parts of Berkeley UNIX to UNIX System V, including vi and curses; as part of the work on curses, she developed terminfo as a replacement for termcap (most of this work shipped as part of SVR2).[7] In 1987, she joined the Bell Labs Computation Center to bring official support for Usenet and Email to Bell Labs.>Horton's 1990 book, Portable C Software[18] became a popular reference for programming in C.[citation needed] It outlined functions and programming techniques that could be reliably used on many different types of computer systems, and which methods were unportable.>Horton is a transgender woman. Adopting the name Mary Ann in 1987, Horton founded Columbus' first transgender support group, the Crystal Club,[20] in 1989. In 1997, she joined EQUAL,[21] Lucent's LGBT employee resource group, and saw the value of being "out" at work, supported by an Equal Opportunity (EO) nondiscrimination policy. At the time, no major company included transgender language in their EO policy. Horton asked for its inclusion in Lucent's policy, and recommended the language "gender identity, characteristics, or expression". As a result, Lucent became the first large company to add transgender-inclusive language to its EO policy in October, 1997.[4]
