1. No modern FS2. No docker/podman support3. No modern init system4. libc is broken5. Half of Kernel is locked. Why do even people donate to this shit
so that you can cope & seethe about it on random basket weaving forums
>1. No modern FSwhat do you need (((modern))) fs for? what's wrong with ext4?2. No docker/podman supportyou can't just run a binary?3. No modern init systemby modern you mean jewish systemd, alright4. libc is brokenit isn't5. Half of Kernel is locked. i don't know what that even means>Why do even people donate to this shitthe openbsd people made many of the most important libraries in the programming world used literally everywhere, it's not only os
>>106653744It's package manager is written in perl. Fucking perl. It's ports build system doesn't allow any artifacts downloading during build phase, which is delusional. Moreover, no modern programming languages takes this platform seriously because it's being run by Mesozoic boomers.
once GNU/Linux gets too pozzed, people will start developing for it
>>106653762>It's package manager is written in perl. Fucking perl
>>106653746>what do you need (((modern))) fs for? what's wrong with ext4?OpenBSD doesn't support ext4 fyi. >you can't just run a binary?Half of the binaries don't support OpenBSD. On Linuxland, if a binary doesn't support my distro, I can just spin up a supported distro container and run my shit there. Also keeps the OS free from dependency hell. >by modern you mean jewish systemd, alrightAt least port OpenRC or runit. But nah, let's rely on fucking shell scripts like it's 1900s. >4. libc is brokenit isn't It is. Port Kitty into OpenBSD, you'll see what I am talking about. OpenBSD devs willy nilly remove shit from their libc. I may have been outdated about the locked parts of their Kernel. Apologies. I understand OpenBSD's contribution to some of the most widely used programs, but what is to say they couldn't come up with the same if they contributed to Linux?
>>106653772?
>>106653819Openbsd is not linux What's the point of this shit thread, just go backto your container bloated linux and play kitty
>>106653819>Port Kitty into OpenBSDeslfag
>>106653728NetBSD>>>>>>>>>>>>>>OpenBSD
>>106653728Because it filters retards like you.
>>106653762Other package managers are written in python or BASH. How is perl any worse?
>>106653728I tried FreeBSD a couple of weeks back.I had no UI. Apparently, it's separately installed?wtf?
>>106654538it's notzoomers fear power
>>106654556just like on linux
>>106653819>At least port OpenRC or runit. But nah, let's rely on fucking shell scripts like it's 1900s. There is an openBSD port for runit. Pretty sure you could also port OpenRC onto openBSD, but that wouldn't really fix the "it's all shell scripts" part
>>106654556>pkg install xorg <preferred de/wm>Try GhostBSD if that's too hard for you.
>>106654538perl lost its userbase and fell behind. it is obsolete museum piece
>>106654628>nobody uses Perl anymore, it’s obsoleteJust like C with Rust
OpenBSD is pretty fun for tinkering and reading the source. I wouldn't actually use it for anything. FreeBSD however is actually reasonable for a server.
>>106654135>>106654368Can't find any valid point to criticize, so instead resorts to insults. Like a true *BSD cult member.
>>106654538Compare pkg_* tools to something like nix,guix,apt,dnf,xbps, if you don't see the gulf in quality and the hackjob that the OpenBSD team has put together, I feel sorry for you. Even FreeBSD's pkg is better.
>>106653762> It's package manager is written in perl. Fucking perl.Yeah can you imagine doing something without an industry approved react+JS stack nowadays? Unbelievable.My recruiter would laugh.
>>106654862Webshitters need not comment in this thread. Use C to rewrite the package manager,like any sane team would.
All I know is that I have filtered out 20 threads just so I can use a board that says "technology" on the top of the page to discuss technology rather than be exposed to weird pervert shit and racist obsession. Or even low effort quips like this.To, simply, discuss technology. Or literature. Or literally anything meaningful on an intellectual level. It doesn't have to be this bad. Some people actually want to discuss things.
>>106654862hold your react+js horses retardof all old crusty languages they should have written it in C like freebsd. it would be noticeable faster and TRV & KVLT
>>106654918>low effort quips>>106653744Like thisIt is used for networking and security mostly.
>>106654943https://runbsd.info/
>>106654943Can you give me some examples?I am using an OpenBSD box as a firewall,and I like it. But it's simply not cut out for desktop use. Also, isn't the networking stack of FreeBSD better?
Perl? Yeah, and it still does exactly what it’s supposed to – reliable, readable, and auditable. Just because you need a thousand npm packages to print “Hello world” doesn’t mean OpenBSD is the problem.The ports system forbids downloading artifacts during build precisely so you know what you’re compiling and don’t wake up tomorrow with a “surprise” from some random GitHub maintainer. That’s not delusional, that’s called security.And about those “Mesozoic boomers” – funny how people who’ve been writing code for 20+ years are still delivering a more stable OS than all the corporate circuses with their “modern” languages. Maybe it’s not a dinosaur, but the fossil fuel that still keeps the internet running.
>>106654628I write perl every single day for money you dumb zoomer nigger.80-90% of code in the real world is "dead languages", Cobol, perl, C, C++, fortran
>>106653728The point is so big tech can use it to kill the GPL. That's the only reason to use it. Otherwise, it's just a worse Linux.
>>106655138My condolences. >>106655050My hello world example #include<stdio.h>int main(void){printf("Hello World");}
#include<stdio.h>int main(void){printf("Hello World");}
>>106655050>The ports system forbids downloading artifacts during build precisely so you know what you’re compiling and don’t wake up tomorrow with a “surprise” from some random GitHub maintainer. That’s not delusional, that’s called security.You know what else is security? Using a fucking sandbox to run your programs. But oh well, I guess that concept is too modern for the boomers of BSDLand to understand.
>>106655050>And about those “Mesozoic boomers” – funny how people who’ve been writing code for 20+ years are still delivering a more stable OS than all the corporate circuses with their “modern” languages. Maybe it’s not a dinosaur, but the fossil fuel that still keeps the internet running.Even you can deliver a more stable OS than corpo shills if that meant gatekeeping half of the features a modern dev environment needs to function.
>>106654918>muuh racism bad>>>/discord/>>>/reddit/>>>/facebook/
>>106653762>doesn't allow any artifacts downloading during build phaseBased and offline-pilled. Every good Linux distro requires the same.
