>Describes how to create LLMs as a thought experiment in a small aside while establishing the foundations of the entirety of field of informatics>In the fucking fifties why don't we have people like this anymore
>>106660612>Dude what if we just took the sum of the product of the output and it's log
>>106660612there are plenty, they're just not as recognized as before
you're wasting your time, nobody on /g/ knows who you're talking about
>>106660612AI research isn't science anymore. It's more like engineering now.
>>106660612There are. You're looking for theoretical types. Mathematicians mainly.
I never once had a use for LLM or found AI generated text spam helpful. It all reads like Google-translated Wikipedia to me. As in, a bad translation of erroneous popular opinion.
>>106660612A ridiculous percentage of CS was spawned in the late 50s and 60s, often just byproducts of other research too.Boomers were simply a different species then.But mysteriously we started getting sabotaged and retarded, starting with food and water tampering.really makes one ponder
>>106660612it's a lot easier to make anything from nothing, than it is to try to create something in anything. that makes no sense but it kinda does. im drunk bye.
>>106661733AI creates nothing from something. Like niggers.
>>106660612>>Describes how to create LLMs as a thought experiment in a small aside May I see it?
>>106661745No.
>>106661724why N. Korea isolated itself? and from what?
>>106660612Leaded gasoline or something.
Why do people (yt) usually attribute shit to dead white men that literally had nothing to do with what BIPOC created?
>>106660887
>>106660887It is log?
>>106660612Maybe we have them and you just can't tell without the benefit of hindsight.
>>106661724>Boomers were simply a different species then.wouldn't have been boomers, they were only just getting born and growing up. would have been the greatest generation and some of the silent generation.
>>106660612>why don't we have people like this anymoreWe do but people don't listen to them.>>106662952Russkie! /g/ needs flags.
>>106660612>why don't we have people like this anymoreBecause people in the 1950s already basically came up with everything we simply didn't have the compute power to implement it at the time.Also the brownification of the western world.
>>106660612It only had to be done once and it's already done.
>>106661646>There are. You're looking for theoretical types. Mathematicians mainly.Claude Shannon was an engineer
>>106661724Boomers weren't doing anything in the 50s and 60s you hopeless brainrotted downie cuck.
>>106660612>insert [question] into encyclopedia database>scrape answers>spin answers: "this is a [sentence | combination of words | answer to your question]"
>>106660612I think the problem is that it's way easier to contribute to a new field of knowledge than to an established oneit's the reason basic sciences don't really advance much anymore (beyond biology, but that's limited by technology, I think)
Would you have heard about Shannon in the 50s ? People at the time knew Einstein, maybe the Manhattan project guys, but that's about it.
