>building a webbrowser is a huge task, ladybird is the only option!!!!Why does no body talk about the huge amount of independent web browsers? NetSurf for example has been getting bi-yearly updates since 2002. People act like theres only 3 browser engines, "then also ladybird", ignoring things like servo and the likes.
Because a "web browser" has evolved from being a simple document viewer into a parasitic operating system. Making a document viewer is relatively easy, but making it keep up with whatever Google pulls out of its ass is the real hard part.
>>106701960except google is supported
>>106702000I'm talking about the web standards that Google has been introducing over the years, not the search engine itself.
>>106702014yep, all supported
>>106702023Really? That's awesome, I ought to give NetSurf a chance sometime. Can you post here with it?
>>106702046yep it supports everything
>>106701926Website still looks like 2002. Damn... Doesn't make me want to down it..
>>106702095yep by design to keep the zoomers out
>>106702048right
>>106702125this happens when you have outdated system libraries, not a netsurf issue
>>106702221Does netsurf push everything on to the system?
>NetSurf 3.11 released>3 Feb 2024>NetSurf 3.10 released>24 May 2020loled
>>106701926because making a browser that actually works with modern web standards, renders all the content properly and has all the features of modern browsers is anything but easy>b-b-b-but muh netscape works with googleNo tranny, its not even remotely comparable to big, modern web browsers. You will get locked out of half online services out there
>>106702801but my netscape works with google
>>106702801And what awards have YOUR big, modern web browsers won? I'll wait.
>>106702899>Netsurf beat off stiff competition...
>>106702718>I must... UPDOOOOOOT!!!!
>>106702965
>>106702982Websites don't use features until they have been supported by all major browsers for a few years.
>>106703416LOL no.
>>106703416My websites do. I often read HTML and CSS spec revisions.It gets ~20 visitors a month but still.
>>106703444NetSurf has a live update feature where they can send updates over the air. They're not listed on their website, its just some sandboxed javascript they send.>>106703448Send your website i'll take a screenshot with netsurf
>>106703460why are you shilling netsurf faggot? no one is going to use it until your browser has extension support.
>>106703487it has browser extension support
Chrome Browser: AURBrave Browser: AUROpera Browser: AURLibrewolf Browser: AUREdge Browser: AURNetSurf: OFFICIAL ARCH PACKAGEAll of the cope in this thread from h8ers is insane.
>>106701926
>>106703548Can i download Netsurf on Windows?Or is it really only Unix?
>>106703550Yes, it supports windows.
>>106703557That's amazing. I like it when they support all platforms. Even minor platforms like Haiku etc.
>>106703557Does it have a working adblock?YouTube?
>>106703578Yes, it has adblock and supports youtube.
>>106702125He took this screenshot on an intentionally very old version of NetSurf. Heres a screenshot from the latest version.
Webkit won, just use luakit.
>>106703658You are implying that there can only be one winner. Plus, it's not a popularity test, what matters is support, and NetSurf supports everything you could throw at it.
>>106702048So it suports WebGL, WebUSB, WebHID, WebGPU? Great!
>>106703861Unironically yes.
>>106703861It's actually one of the leaders in this area.
>>106703902No it's fucking not you lying faggothttps://www.netsurf-browser.org/documentation/progressAlso>HTML 5 Just started An HTML 5 compliant parser is being developed.>JavaScript Just started Details on the User Information page.>PNG Nearly done Gamma correction is not correct for PNGs with alpha channels.Lmao what a garbage
>>106702856ok, now try it with major CDNs or financial websites.>>106702899>m-m-m-my le hekin niche, obscure browser is cute and valid because my fellow xisters gave me irrelevant awardstranny
netsurf team cant into marketing will stay a hobby project foreverladybird got many big donations and now a huge one from cloudflare, will actually deliever
>>106701926Netsurf sucks since they started using gtk3 and they also roll their own libraries for everything. Dillo is way better and more secure, and looks like a good browser too.Nothing against you OP though, i used to know about netsurf only too. The library shit is inexcusable though, same thing with palemoon and this weird trend of forcing upstream libraries. I don't trust your libraries, my OS is just better at dealing with that.
>>106703545>You can't just host corporate binaries with non-open source code on your own repo.Yeah that's how that works
>>106703938That page clearly states at the top that it was last updated in 2012. It is outdated. You are the "lying faggot".>>106703999Do you even know what a CDN is? Of course they work. They sit in front of a server and cache shit, it looks no different to the browser. And yes financial websites work great.
>>106704025>scripting is ignored completelybased
>>106704027okay niggertroon , do the cloudflare check then and post webm with it, I dare you.
>>106704032yeah, isn't it the same for netsurf? do i remember wrong?fuck scripting guys, no point in using le old browser when you want post 2010 technology. i'm posting from another PC with another browser right now, but my main rig has dillo and i mostly use no JS websites.
>>106704027>Do you even know what a CDN is? Of course they work.kek even 4chan's cdn don't work
So, out of Netsurf, Ladybird and Servo, which ones will usurp Chrome one day?
>>106701926people act like there are only two partiesthe masses are dumb
