Whats up with this loli obsession? is it suitable for a tech billionaire?
>>106704683It's part of his le quirky autismo act.
>>106704683autists are all pedos. no exceptions.
ロリは自由however, xitter still allows "witchhunts" to immediately suspend accounts before some assumed reviewin fact, I've never witnessed an artist account that became un-suspended over time, leading one to believe that there is no such review process
>>106704709he's a tranny??
>>106704709>Elon musk's autism is fake. It's a cover for him being a sociopath.Autistic and sociopaths share alot of characteristics so an autist can become a sociopath fast, how do I know this?I have been on this website too long were I feel I am becoming desensitized to the murder of people on the internet.
>is it suitable for a tech billionaire?What kind of question is this? Do billionaires have to be held to some sort of standard? Are we capable of collectively taking away their money if they don't meet that standard? Do you have any ability to tank the value of Tesla shares by an arbitrary amount in proportion to how much Musk does or does not meet your desired level of "suitablity"?Reality is the man can do whatever he wants for the most part. People already think he's weird, but that doesn't really mean much.
>>106704709ehh almost sociopath here except im not charismatic at all
>>106704918>im not charismatic at allsociopaths aren't charismaticI think you are confusing it with psychopaths which are and they use that to their advantage.
>>106704830goodlearn the rule of the landyour picrel is borderline illegal.what would make it illegal is if the model presented in it would have made a lewd facealso write in english, faggotthis is an english site
>>106704931Presenting a lewd face would not make the image illegal in the United States, where 4chan is hosted. For loli to be considered illegal in the United States, it must be "obscene". Obscenity is very narrowly defined by the courts for the purposes of deciding what speech is not protected by the first amendment. It requires a three pronged test where any absent attribute makes something not obscene. These attributes are: 1. Whether the work, taken as a whole, appeals to the prurient interest (prurient = excessive/inappropriate interest in sexual matters).2. Whether the work describes in a patently offensive way, sexual conduct or excretory functions, in a manner defined by applicable state law. 3. Whether the work, taken as a whole, lacks serious artistic, literary, scientific, or political value. The last prong is extremely difficult to prove, as "art" is broadly defined. That work clearly has artistic value, and I would even go so far as to say it has serious artistic value (the girl is quite pretty). So it's not obscene. Even if you give her a lewd face.
>>106704683Explain what is wrong with liking lolis
>>106704830I hate to be that guy but sauce on that pic? Or at least what board its from so I can check the archives
>>106704931rules and laws don't mean shit against an automated system that gets tripped by false reports, in any case
>>106705007>Obscenity is very narrowly defined by the courtsno. its defined by us communal contemporary standardslearn the law, and stop polluting this board with your retard shit
>>106704927but aren't psychopats just retards and heavy drinkers/drug abusers/gambling addicts/easily ending up in jail because they just break the law impulsively?
>>106705081its actually called "antisocial personality disorder" and theres several types of em
>>106705071Can you read anon, the "communal contemporary standards" isn't written for the third prong Which makes a lot of sense, it'd be a problem if people's fleeting opinions could cause the burning of historic art (not that this doesn't still end up happening, but the intent of the wording here is to prevent this)
>>106705259no, it doesnt mean thatits a synonym to "average person, applying contemporary adult community standards"what does prevent the proverbial burning of alexandria so to speak is the "lacking scientific value" part.history is a social science.
>>106705034masuda (yousaytwosin)
>>106705034>>>/a/195868770
>>106704709tf is a "baby momma"?
>>106704830Gooks will go extinct by 2050 and good riddance, shit anti-human society, cope and seethe lolipedo
>>106704683Can't you show something that proves your point instead of vague posting like a retard?
>>106706340only "gooks"?we'd probably all be gone by then
>>106704683If I was a multi billionaire I wont get married but I would have a lawyer write me a nice boilerplate civil contract and I would have a few girlfriends living in their own houses in a gated community I had built and own, and I would hope to have 6 to 12 kids between them all, and yes the children will know who their father is
>>106704683Oh no Muskbros you might want to avoid looking at the news today
>>106704683Don't you get it? He's basste and one of us lol! so randum lmaoAlso mildly retarded nofrens faggot that's going to die alone.Wow, what a channer!
>>106704683Is there a single image of this man that doesn't have him looking strung out on 400 different uppers
>>106705441thats probably mari seen noone else kick behind own shoulder
>>106708925>it's real
>>106711890even if trumps not in them he has seen the files and has been hanging out with elonsooo
Most Jewish thread on 4chan.
>>106704709So many butthurt autists don't want him part of their group. Autists: your group is shit and you're retarded.
>>106704683>rich person is a pedoWow.
>>106704740no u
>>106704709you post this in every musk thread across several boards
>>106704830they can get unsuspended if you make an appeal.i know a few loli artists that have succeeded getting their account back that way.
