Giant robots are technology. Wouldn't mechs be perfect for construction jobs?
>>106713278https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Square%E2%80%93cube_law
>>106713305
>>106713278Actually yes if done right.But I think there are quite a few problems right now. The auxiliary systems would need to recycle oil and other stuff in order for the joints to be more durable and hold up.But with the current technology, it looks good on paper, but it wouldn't work effectively.
>>106713321Not a robot.It's a machine but not a robot per se.
>>106713321I want one of those.
>>106713278man i wish we still had iron works and steel foundaries. thanks jews for tricking the boomers into trading them for ethnic food and being a minority in the country their ancestors founded.
>>106713321Bagger 288!
>>106713278A giant mech could replace all these vehicles
>>106713278depends are you building pyramid or wood nail structure
>>106713380Go away your material is old and boring and you're stupid. >>106713278Power suits would be better because construction also requires a lot of fine work sometimes. But why make a mech that's expensive and requires more upkeep then some guys +equipment
>>106713385Yes, but it wouldn't be as efficient
>>106713398A mech is also an equipment, a single one instead of dozens: >>106713385
>>106713346>robots have to look humanoidilliterate retard
>>106713398mechs can go up elevators and cranes
>>106713485>strawmanuneducated retard
>>106713321where's Engels?
>>106713321>>106713383https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=azEvfD4C6ow
