[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/g/ - Technology


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: vertical-tabs.jpg (172 KB, 1536x864)
172 KB
172 KB JPG
>eats your horizontal screen space
>>
>>106714879
They were so close to creating the best design and then they screwed it up so heavily
>>
Oh no, not my heckin horizontal space! Not the dimension that I have too much of, the horror!
>>
>meanwhile on pale meme
>auto-hide tab bar: on
>>
https://github.com/black7375/Firefox-UI-Fix
bring back ze old ui and minimalist mode for the ultimate pixel save
>>
>>106714962
op btfo'd
>>
>>106714879
only adhd zoomers use this shit
>>
Why would you ever need so many tabs that you need to take up 25% of your screen to display them.
Some people are just lost in the sauce.
>>
>>106714961
If you have too much horizontal space, you're not using your screen space effectively.
>>
unused screen space is wasted screen space
>>
>>106714879
most chromium devices let you auto hide the bar until you hover over an icon.
>>
I'm glad Icecat supports vertical tabs now
>>
I've been using a widescreen display for like over a decade now.
>>
>>106714879
It gets even worse if you have a side dock.
>>
>>106715207
Shoulda put ur dock on the other side n00b
>>
>>106714879
No it doesn't, literally 0 if you are smart enough but you are not apparently.

>>106715143
kek
>>
>>106715019
>zoomers
Terry A. Davis used it
>>
>>106715854
the patron saint of edgy zoomers
>>
>>106715857
Still not a zoomer.
>>
>>106714879
>icon-only vtabs
>>
File: file.png (322 KB, 1920x1184)
322 KB
322 KB PNG
>>106714879
Just use Tridactyl and hide your tabs.
Easiest management, and you maintain 100% of your screen space.
>>
>>106715207
>side dock
reddit.
>>
>>106714879
Use auto-hide
>>
theyre fucking great
>>
>>106718060
What is so great about them?
>>
>>106714879
in nearly every case, i would rather have more vertical screen space than horizontal. doubly so considering how many websites nowadays insist on having a retardedly huge navbar.
>>
>>106718918
i can see the fucking tab title
>>
>>106719211
Did you know that if there is a very large list of links you want to get back to later, there's already a feature for that? It's called bookmarks. For tabs, you only ever have a few of them open at once as a means of multitasking, which means the title of each tab is visible.
>>
>>106719269
i dont fucking care
>>
File: 20250927_13h26m22s_grim.png (17 KB, 625x1038)
17 KB
17 KB PNG
>>106714879
no it doesn't
>>
>>106719307
That's still using up horizontal screen space
>>
>>106719623
i dont want horizontal screen space i want a 4:3 monitor you ape go fuck yourself
>>
File: 1755725929440618.webm (1.6 MB, 1044x520)
1.6 MB
1.6 MB WEBM
>>106714879
i cannot go back to vertical tabs.
the low information available is just too crippled.
>>
>>106714879
I miss tabsmixplus and multirow tabs
>>
>>106720537
>zoomer removes tabs and re-invents bookmarks
>>
>>106721088
not all of it is important enough to bookmark and my computers fast enough now this is nothing. my computers not doing anything else besides having firefox, video, text editor, node servers going.
>>
>>106720652
I left firefox when they fucked up multi-row tabs. The way I use browsers has changed since then, but that's when they lost me.
>>
File: post-12-1098049148.jpg (168 KB, 801x603)
168 KB
168 KB JPG
Can you still add a crazy amount of toolbars in modern browsers?
>>
>>106721755
That computer is probably running all that on 32 mb of ram.
>>
>>106721822
zoomer-kun... please say you're just trolling (or "rage baiting" as the kids say now)
>>
>>106714879
You know you can have it collapse the vertical tab bar until you hover your mouse over it.
>>
>>106714879
>vertical screen space is what's lacking
>horizontal screen space eaten
>frees up vertical screen space
oh no, the horror
>>
>>106714879
Sites are made for phoneposters so it's not an issue.
>>
>>106714962
>pale meme
I would love to use it if it wasn't slow as fuck on anything bigger than 4chan
>>
>>106720537
how do you make your tabs that slim? I need that
>>
>>106724720
mods to this!
https://github.com/Dook97/firefox-qutebrowser-userchrome
>>
>>106724749
thanks anon
>>
>>106724699
>anything bigger than 4chan
use case?
>>
>>106724759
Who the fuck only browses 4chan throughout their day?
>>
>>106724774
Me
>>
>>106714879
most shit doesn't even need to fit the width of the page, it's a lot easier with vertical tabs
>>
>>106724749
working pretty good on IceCat now that it does vertical tabs natively, I just picked the relevant part to make the tabs slimmer and ignored the rest
now to transfer the rest of my settings and finally get rid of Firefox for good
>>
File: Nolife.jpg (48 KB, 750x600)
48 KB
48 KB JPG
>>106724783
Get a life
>>
>>106724853
nice. ive been meaning to switch to waterfox myself. ill try icecat too sometime.
>>
>>106724866
>ill try icecat too sometime
it's basically Firefox ESR but without the spyware. hopefully your distro has the latest version, it's up to date on the AUR but not sure about other distros
>>
>>106724853
oh does the firefox shortcut work to shrink the vertical tabs?
its
CTRL+COMMAND+Z

to toggle between the states
>>
>>106724880
I don't have a command key on my Linux machines but ctrl-alt-Z reduced the tabs to only show the favicon for me. I prefer keeping the titles visible desu, just wanted them to be less tall, not less wide (if I want them less wide I can just drag the tab panel border to reduce it)
>>
>>106724891
yeah thats what i meant. cool, i'd need that functionality to want to switch. one thing that sucks about firefox is how locked down their shortcuts seem to be, if you want to switch something to a personal preference. maybe on the forks it's easier.
>>
>>106724901
>yeah thats what i meant. cool, i'd need that functionality to want to switch
if you're on macOS you're probably gonna have to compile IceCat yourself if you want to use it. I don't think they provide macOS binaries nowadays, only Linux
>>
>>106720537
Setup?
>>
>>106725340
what do you mean?
>>106724749
>>
>>106714879
>eats your horizontal screen space
This hardly matters because most sites are designed around shitty, portrait mode interfaces.
>>
>mouse off the firefox window
>tabs get stuck expanded
>tabs will randomly get stuck expanded and you have to drag a tab to get it to collapse properly
HOW HAS THIS SHIT BEEN BROKEN FOR MONTHS NOW
>>
>>106715128
>the broader Internet is not using your screen space effectively
ftfy
>>
>>106725954
>most sites are designed around shitty, portrait mode interfaces
Name 4
>>
>>106726979
4chan.org
>>
>>106714879
unless you have a small screen res, it doesn't matter. most sites have huge amounts of empty space to accommodate mobile viewing better.
>>
>>106726979
1. apple.com
2. microsoft.com
3. nintendo.com
4. arstechnica.com

look at the fucking margins on these sites and tell me they're not designed with mobile interfaces in mind.
>>
>>106715207
Wow how did you do that? It's the worst of both worlds.
>>
File: Capture.png (390 KB, 1920x927)
390 KB
390 KB PNG
>>106728453
works on my machine
>>
>>106728491
That’s Ubuntu default dock location.
>>
>>106724749
damn thanks for sharing this
i like qute but it always had a few compatibility quirks and issues that i always kept going back to firefox for
>>
>>106728629
see that bar at the top? also check the footer.
>>
>at work
need to go back to old tabs frequently -> vertical tabs
>at home
tab junkyard to come back later maybe -> horizontal tabs
>>
>>106728860
that bar would be completely unusable on a mobile. Which is why it's not actually there on the mobile site.
How is it "designed with mobile interfaces in mind"?
>>
>>106714879
icon tabs on autohide on topbar
>>
>>106714970
I forgot the name of the project for the life of me but there's this userChrome.css that makes the tabs really nice and small and I cannot use firefox without it now :)
>>
>>106728629
now scroll down you disingenuous faggot
>>
>>106729063
why don't (You) do that and then show the rest of the class what has got your jimmies so rustled?
>>
THEY GIVE BACK ZERO VERTICAL SPACE FOR THE HORIZONTAL SPACE THEY TAKE
YOU JUST GET A WHITE BAR INSTEAD OF TABS
is this a fucking joke
>>
>>106729337
sounds like a skill issue, mine doesn't do that
>>
i've never seen an optional feature provoke such seething

>>106719269
more clicks is more badder
>>
>>106724749
applying some of these tweaks to tab-group objects also helped a bunch for my mess of tabs
thanks, anon
>>
File: le tabs.png (150 KB, 1347x639)
150 KB
150 KB PNG
>>106729938
>more clicks
You could keep the bookmarks pane open at all times if you wanted to. It's not even tied to your browser session unlike tabs, the bookmarks stay for as long as you want so you can return to them anytime (perfect for adhd zoomers)
>>
>>106714879
This is a blessing if you're a 4:3 chad and are forced to use a widescreen monitor.
>>
>>106730538
bookmarks themselves can't be loaded and left idle while you look at something else (this concept is known as a "tab") and there is no close button on each bookmark, nor does the ctrl+w shortcut destroy them (both a feature of tabs)



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.