Is Drew the most annoying faggot?

File: 1758972410701.png (168 KB, 1896x873)

168 KB PNG

meanwhile some random guy's compiler

it's less gay to use rust at this point becausse of fag de vault

>>106714992
Python can do it in 22B.

File: 1226573328.jpg (55 KB, 500x500)

55 KB JPG

>>106714992
>wisinialang

harebump

>>106717240
kys drew

File: hare.png (5 KB, 1920x960)

5 KB PNG

>>106714975

>>106714975
Threading status?

>>106717509
kek

>>106714992
Don't you ever get tired of getting BTFO'd?

>>106714992
>int argc, char *argv[]
>no return 0;
The fuck

>>106718189
no return 0 is whatever but this signature wont compile with -Wall

>>106718189
Newfag alert: "return 0;" in "main" is optional and is implied since C99.
>>106718209
wut

>>106718229
I meant -Wall -Werror

>>106718244
There is nothing wrong with the signature.

>>106718254
there is, both variables are unused and it won't compile with -Wall -Werror
if you don't use arguments then the correct signature is

int main(void)

>>106718276
Yeah, but the problem is not with the signature. There multiple ways to suppress warnings about unused variable.
You can use (void):

(void) argc, (void) argv;

You can use maybe_unused attribute (C23):

int main([[maybe_unused]] int argc, [[maybe_unused]] char *argv[])

or you can omit argument name (C23):

int main(int, char *[])

>>106714975
>larping as drew

>>106714975
I hate Hare.

>>106719928
Why