Is this the Linux Mint killer?It is not Debian based, but, Arch based.Arch users are known to be rude, obese, slobby,shut-in, cartoon-watching, neck-bearded losers and faggots. Why should any rational, straight,normal man install and use this OS?
>>106718634mint is not necessarily the future but their mindset definitely isalso cinnamon and xfce>kdelmoa
>>106718634im pretty sure kde linux is being laughed at by the kde community itself for being so behind on many things
>KDE Linux is an “immutable base OS” Linux distro created using Arch Linux packages, but it should not be considered an “Arch-based distro”; Arch is simply a means to an end, and KDE Linux doesn’t even ship with the pacman package manager.OP is a faggot.
difference between KDE linux and neon? what?
why are there a million immutable linux distroswas Docker really that big of a hit to the ego of shared library absolutists?
>>106718634SteamOS is based on Arch as well. This is because Valve recognizes it's superior and more up to date.
>>106718709Neon was based on Ubuntu. This one's based on Arch. Ubuntu is Debian based and thus too outdated and the KDE devs said it was too much effort tinkering with a stale old Ubuntu base to get newer KDE versions working.
>>106718634KrashOS
>>106718634As a KDE enjoyer it'll be interesting to check out when it releases, but it's years away iirc.
>>106718709Neon was more of a testing groung, but also didn't really see much development or use. I think it was mostly a passion project for one guy.KDE Linux is supposed to be an actual distro people can use day to day and sort of serve as a blank slate for running stock Plasma.That said like a lot of KDE stuff, it will probably released half-finished and then be forgotten about after a few months. Like Neon before it.
>>106718634>ImmutableMaybe I can reccommend it to new people but personally no. I need to make system level changes or atleast be able to load extra modules/hooks into boot for kvm passthrough. Also>Arch with no pacmanCant even reccomend it to anyone wanting to start out learning arch either
>>106718782There is already a build mate.
>>106718634Why are you such an insecure projecting faggot, OP?
>>106718634why would i use this over cachy
>>106718684I hate KDe followin Gnome footsteps. Most of my desktop programs are indeed from KDE, but that is all. I would rather them focusing on supporting stable releases than being bleeding edge, because, honestly, KDE got momentum now to be the default DE and it's better to ensure quality.
>>106718878Oh really? Neat. I'll check it out then
>>106718634It has nothing like rpm-ostree, it is hard to recommend.
>>106718878yeah and they tell you to back up your files because you must expect KDE linux to kill itself regularly
>>106719005>yeah and they tell you to back up your files because you must expect KDE linux to kill itself regularlyI have used it for a while it's very stable but has no package manager so I switch back to kinoite.I couldn't use what I wanted to use.
>>106719025
>>106719037you can replace "KDE Linux" with "KDE" and it will still be 100% correct
>>106719037Doesn't refute my point that it was stable for something that is supposed to be in alpha.
>>106719069>>106719070But why make a new distro when they have neon? doesn't make sense, and it definitely won't make it easier for people to choose a distro from KDE
>>106719109Because nobody wants to work with Jonathan Riddell.
>>106719109Because all the mainteners left except one who got laid off because nobody wanted to touch neon wjth a 10ft pole
>>106719127>>106719137Hmm, it looks interesting I suppose.
>>106718684Does it have an immutable alternative to pacman or are you just supposed to use flatpaks?
>>106718668You're talking about KDE Neon not KDE Linux. Different things.
>>106719109Ubuntu don't push out updates fast enough for their tastes
