how do you respond to this without sounding mad?
meme benchmark fpbp /thread
I don't care.Posed from my M4 iPad.
>>106733973Legit impressive how much dedicated Passmark acceleration hardware Apple managed to cram into that die space.
>>106734011>posed
>>106734174You don't post with a posed look?
>>106733973peak single thread but still can't multitask properly without killing processes
>single threadI sleep
>>106733973Impressive, very niceNow let's see real world performance
>>106733973who is A19 faster than A19 Pro? isn't A19 Pro has higher clock speed and more cache
>>106733973only 12 watts? how is it possible? does it have only 1 core?
>>106733973I too can design an ASIC that runs Assmark really fast and glue it to my cellphone CPU.
>>106733973what does a measure of 1 even mean here
>>106733973Apple's new CPUs are pretty incredible, but they're ARM. They can't be compared to x86 CPUs
>>106733973now show multi thread score
>>106733973all this chart tells me is that an overclocked 285K would be the best option
>>106733973itoddlers WON THE FUCK UP
>liquid ass wins at assmarkColor me shocked.
>>106734011It’s such a great shit posting machine.
>>106733973i-it doesn't count!!
>>106733973A19 > A19 PRO
>>10673397312Watts on a phone form factor, not very practical.You ain't getting half of that performance on an actual iPhone.Not that it matters, it's more like "well what kinda punch will M5 have" tease.
>>106733973Wait where are all the M4s>updated september 2025Is M3 actually better for single threaded than M4?
>>106733973>so much power and absolutely no software to use iti guess you can facetime better than last year?anyway ill be doing actual compiling cya
>>106735868Aren't they supposed to be releasing an inexpensive A19 Macbook sometime soon though?
>>106733973>single threaddamn I love living in 1997 Apple bros
>>106734327Shit like this will get you ICEd anon.
>>106736317imagine doing a fascism all because of a fucking podcaster
>>106736480>enabling pvp to kill Charlie "My Gums aren't Funny" Kirk
Lots of mad sounding responses ITT
>>106733973ok cool, may we see a real world benchmark like GTA V?
>>106736677Please saar, delet that
>>106733973That's pretty dopeI hope it lights a fire under amd's ass to continue innovating faster CPUs or risk getting left behind
>>106733973>zero info on what the benchmarking software is or does>zero info on cache sizes or comparison of micro architectures>zero info on operating system, software schedulers, kernelsBenchmarks don't matter when it can't run Linux and a C compiler. Why should I care about having a super fast smartphone when all it does it call/text and displays emails? Let us know when Apple puts these pieces of shit on industrial modules and open sources all the firmware or at least documents all boot and device interfaces.
>>106733973dont you find it funny the M4 chips all regressed on that microbench
