/g/ - Is there any bigger curse on the Interwebz than th - Technology

Anonymous

09/30/25(Tue)09:39:10 No.106746366

File: sc4.png (2 KB, 448x363)

2 KB PNG

Anonymous 09/30/25(Tue)09:39:10 No.106746366 Archived

Is there any bigger curse on the Interwebz than this?

Anonymous
09/30/25(Tue)09:48:32 No.106746446

Anonymous 09/30/25(Tue)09:48:32 No.106746446

File: crookflare.jpg (108 KB, 1080x757)

108 KB JPG

>>106746366

Anonymous
09/30/25(Tue)09:49:59 No.106746462

Anonymous 09/30/25(Tue)09:49:59 No.106746462

there's nothing wrong with WebP aside from that 4chan can't use it

JonSneeders !q710i/bPrg
09/30/25(Tue)09:51:55 No.106746483

JonSneeders !q710i/bPrg 09/30/25(Tue)09:51:55 No.106746483

>>106746462
>Forced chroma subsampling
There is everything wrong with it.

Anonymous
09/30/25(Tue)09:57:38 No.106746525

Anonymous 09/30/25(Tue)09:57:38 No.106746525

File: 765778939.jpg (92 KB, 434x464)

92 KB JPG

>>106746366
>google forcing this shit down everyone's throats
where is Teddy Roosevelt when you need him?

Anonymous
09/30/25(Tue)10:00:25 No.106746545

Anonymous 09/30/25(Tue)10:00:25 No.106746545

>>106746462
the premise of webp is mentally retarded
>erm umm, it saves 0.2 KB of bandwidth so that's a good thing, actually!
>*serves you with 247 MB of javascript every time you scroll down 1 pixel*

Anonymous
09/30/25(Tue)10:47:04 No.106746966

Anonymous 09/30/25(Tue)10:47:04 No.106746966

>>106746525
Trump's DOJ is opening an antitrust suit against Google so...meh.

Anonymous
09/30/25(Tue)13:19:47 No.106748474

Anonymous 09/30/25(Tue)13:19:47 No.106748474

File: 1751514351645.png (1022 KB, 1920x1030)

1022 KB PNG

It's yet another episode of OP, the shit-for-brains-fucktard, complaining about something he does not understand.

Anonymous
09/30/25(Tue)14:32:22 No.106749250

Anonymous 09/30/25(Tue)14:32:22 No.106749250

File: toshiba_498ppi_display_co(...).jpg (63 KB, 400x628)

63 KB JPG

>>106746483
It's only a real problem in displays below 100 PPI. A modern day 1440p 27 inch display achieves about 109 PPI. Phone/tablet displays achieve even higher PPI than that. The hatred for chroma sub sampling is a big meme desu at least today.

https://www.calculatorsoup.com/calculators/technology/ppi-calculator.php

Anonymous
09/30/25(Tue)14:35:14 No.106749274

Anonymous 09/30/25(Tue)14:35:14 No.106749274

>>106748474
now show it at a fidelity that doesn't cause eye bleed.

Anonymous
09/30/25(Tue)14:38:40 No.106749315

Anonymous 09/30/25(Tue)14:38:40 No.106749315

>>106746446
This. At least most browsers can display webp. Cuckflare only runs on cuckflare approved browsers.

Anonymous
09/30/25(Tue)14:41:03 No.106749335

Anonymous 09/30/25(Tue)14:41:03 No.106749335

>>106746366
>right click
>copy image
>open paint
>paste
>save as
>profit?

Anonymous
09/30/25(Tue)14:57:08 No.106749522

Anonymous 09/30/25(Tue)14:57:08 No.106749522

File: images (1).png (23 KB, 515x388)

23 KB PNG

>>106749274
While it would be nice for all lossy images on the web to be archival quality, it's just not the kind of bandwidth most websites can afford. While it's technically true that WebP doesn't save much on filesize when targeting DMOS scores that cause most people to fail to differentiate between the original and lossy image, it still ends up saving a massive amount of bandwidth for the web for DMOS scores between 3 and 4.

Crazy right? Websites don't run on god magic or pixie dust but there's real human beings that have to pay bills so the website stays up.