>0 attention on /g/You will miss this just like you missed crypto.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lEcg6AJ6DVY
>>106749798>miss this like you missed cryptoAI isn't profitable for end users. Also, why am I supposed to get excited about a small incremental upgrade that will be shadowed by some other model next week?
>>106749798>sora>2025wan BTFO this shit and it's local
>>106749798ok
>>106749798Mogs Veo3 but invitation only+iOS exclusive is gay.
>>106749798ok that anime scene was was kinda nice. just need a local version without the censorship
>>106750071>just need a local version without the censorshipAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
>>106749798can i make porn with this or will it block me
>>106750302you probably can't even prompt women unless all the skin besides the face is covered
>>106749798Whats the priosoe of creating extremely realistic Ai videos other than allwoogm corporate ghouls to replace artists and actors? Or nefarious people to create fake evidence and Ai deep fake porn
>omgggg I NEEEEEEEEED to advertise more slop generators!!!!Spam the already-existent aislop generals you whore.
>>106750327prompt: skintight, moist
>>106749798use case?
>>106750423funni memeshttps://xcancel.com/ai_for_success/status/1973097111064289332#m
>>106749798There is no use real case for this. AI is a joke and merely a way to scam speculative investors.Why should I be impressed? If you slow down videos created by sora2, you are able to clearly tell it is fake.
>>106750642local car dealer made an ad with AIit wasn't even good ai. It was obvious, but I assume they didn't have to pay actors. And they used it and don't care that it's ai slop, and you'll get used to it eventually.
>>106750327>>106750302hyper censored
>>106750665So it'll make the world a shittier, more banal place. filled to the brim with slop AI ads? And I'm supposed to be hyped for some "Singularity" because...
>>106749798You're telling me I can finally make my dream anime in a few more years?
anyone with an invite code can offer some insights?how expensive and how many generations do you even get?
https://video.twimg.com/amplify_video/1973130135026237440/vid/avc1/352x640/HhC5t36rROlw1NFQ.mp4
>>106749837>AI isn't profitable for end users.You're actually wrong. But I'm not going to completely spoonfeed you. You'll have to do the digging yourself somewhere like twitter to find out how people are making money providing serives and building companies with AI.Even just randoms posting gens that have little skill or planning behind them are collecting trillions of views on social media collectively. That poster's crypto analogy is actually a pretty good one. But you won't believe it anyway so it doesn't matter.
>>106752402Great post thanks
>>106749798>/g/ proves it's the most tech-illiterate board on 4chin once again>remains unemployed while constantly missing out on new opportunities to make money using new tech nothing new.
>check front page>find thishttps://files.catbox.moe/9yz1iu.mp4its actually over for animators, rightfully so
>>106750747Your dream anime is always just a few years away!
>>106752464>ur ludditesYou sound like an NFT-tard. It should be legal to euthanize you.
>OMG WHY US NO ONE TALKING ABOUT THE NEW SAFETYSLOP??!??!!
>>106749798>luddite seethe itt
Imagine the pornography though
>>106750071See you in 2125
>>106752402That’s not a market that will last, in that you offer little unique except being an early adopter. With enough adopters you’ll end up having to invest just as much time to differentiate yourself from the thousands of other people producing the same shit with the same models, and it’s dubious as to whether it’d survive post-subsidised AI. All of the services people use to run these models are burning investor money at an insane rate to make the end models affordable to use. Furthermore, there’s indications that Google and similar are astroturfing AI content creation to try and gaslight a use case into existence, presumably to increase their stock prices in the AI bubble. Furthermore, due to the ease of doing this, it’s long term value to both viewers and to the advertisers you’d get your money from is shaky at best. People inevitably attach worth to perceived effort, and if you’re offering little unique against the millions of other bots it’s not clear why you’d see any success. I guess I am ignoring the weird incestuous human centipede nature of online advertising and bots, in that it’s all a big grift to keep companies believing online advertising is at all effective.
>>106750071>just need a local version without the censorshipwait for a chinese model, as always
