don't agree to work for a startup if you're not willing to crunch. i mean this sincerely.
>don't agree to work [...] if you're not willing to crunchmany such cases
>>106752213oh shut upif they got hired then that's the problem/mistake of the person who hired them
>>106752213Donβt burn people out at your startup without vesting shares and performance based bonuses.
>>106752213Employment is employment, if you expect more dedication than you pay for then give me shares
>>106752213This is every startup ever. You join a high risk high reward role were you need to work your ass off for the company to IPO or exit somehow and get your payout. If you want wlb join some boomer Healthcare company, you basically get paid to drool
>>106752213I only get paid without any shares, so I'm working the same pace as I would in a boomer company
Offer me more than 1% of general purpose stock and I'll give a shit about your company
>>106752255Also, many such usecases