>more telemetry than windows
Why do people come to this board and just lie?

Should I switch from fedora sway to universal blue on my framework 13?

>More telemetry than windows
What are you smoking OP?

>>106763722
ragebait

>>106763688
>tips fedora

>>106763688
>uses btrfs for literally zero reason
wait it doesn't have automatic snapshots like the green lizard

>>106763747
if you want to switch because of what OP said you're a retard.
Yes gnome is shitty, but btrfs snapshots are unequalled and fedora collects zero telemetry by default unless you count number of files downloaded from getfedora, even then it's not "more than windows".
OP is a faggot as always.
>>106764392
not sure what the suse does but I don't think fedora sets up snapshots automatically, you'd need timeshift or snapper.

>>106763722
>>106763765
https://coreos.github.io/rpm-ostree/countme/

>>uses btrfs for literally zero reason
Fedora is meant to use the latest open source solutions in order to create open standards for everyone, same happened with systemd, NetworkManager, Pulseaudio, pipewire, Wayland, flatpak, podman, and more. You getting pissed off at a distro that has proven been right for decades is just sad, because the whole point of Fedora is to explore innovation, not to be the substitute for other distros.

>>GNOME is the default
Just install another desktop environment or an spin ISO and stop crying about it, a Linux user crying about not being able to choose should go back to Windows.
fedoraproject.org/spins

>>1067650663
>more telemetry than windows
Oh what an strong argument, you sir have let the world know an anonymous rpm counter is worse than whatever is being gathered from you through Steam, your ISP, even Flathub, Homebrew, Yarn and NPM counts install calls, so they have to be spyware too, worse than Windows in all possible ways.

I'm seriously worried about the mental state of you "linux users". Having all the wrong ideas about the software industry in general, you seem more like normie users who have done some commands in your free time and felt like hackers after that.

>>106765066
>can use
>not only is it opt-in, but it's also for rpm-ostree
>not only is it opt-in and for rpm-ostree, but it's also fore coreos

>>106765066
>a server knows exactly when someone is accessing it and knows which resource is being accessed
It's almost like literally every single backend works like this by default and can't even work differently.

>>106765454
>opt-in
Opt-out on Ublue stuff. Same with the homebrew package manager analytics, that they ship.

How well is fedora suited to run as a daily driver on my (gaming) desktop compared to other distros?

>>106765922
have a separate gaming partition running bazzite

>>106765922
I do gaming and no issues at all. It is a general purpose distro, so optimized distros like Bazzite may run better, some cases it will run the same. Arch also runs better because its packages are always close to upstream, Fedora usually takes days before updating package version because they go through testing, Arch does quick basic testing and moves on.

>>106765697
>Opt-out on Ublue stuff
As it should be on all distros. I'm fucking tired of people making up shit when it comes to Linux usage and distro specific usage.

>>106765922
It's fine, but something like Bazzite is much more convenient since many of Fedoras inconveniences are handled for you in Ublue distros.