This piece of shit act allowed companies to monitor our communications and report them to the feds WITHOUT A WARRANT OR FEAR OF REPERCUSSIONS under the guise of "nAtIoNaL sEcUrItY", and now it's fucking expired with no renewal in sight!
>>106768697The incompetent government doesn't renew it but also doesn't go after anyone for illegally selling the info. So nothing changes, in fact the sharing of data gets worse
Was that ever legal to begin with? Probably not, there was simply nobody caring/rich/educated enough to sue.Anyways, very cool. Why are encryption algorithms seen as weapons still?
>>106768697>Blocked in the SenateThank you RepublicansAnd all it took was a complete despot administration like Joe Biden to convince them to drop it.
>>106768697>americans try to not help terrorists and pedophiles challenge (impossible)EU chads keep winning with chat control
>>106769153Chat control is illegal and allows the people to murder their politicians.Look up the laws. Freedom comes from violence. It's even written down.
>>106768697that's neat, will you sue the government/companies now?You could have always sued them under CISA and I genuinely doubt it would have held up in supreme court because its quite the insane loophole around the 4th amendment.
>>106769304Not him, but once I started doing exactly that, my life turned to the better.
>>106769112>Was that ever legal to begin with?They wouldn't use the data in a way where it could be challenged. The companies would give the feds full access to their databases, feds would do their thing, when they find some content they don't like they'd tell the company and then the company would "notify" the feds so they can get a warrant to re-obtain the data they already had.
>>106768697This law isn't shit. It's just legal bloat about sharing vuln and malware info. Wake me up when the FISA shit that you confused it with expires.
