[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/g/ - Technology


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: 16900697.png (6 KB, 280x280)
6 KB
6 KB PNG
why is it eternally inferior to cuda?
>>
>>106776174
It's literally half the speed is hilarious
Nvidia I assume patented the only decent way to handle memory interleaving
>>
>>106776174
because of Lisa Su's collusion with her cousin Jensen Fag. Zluda proves that it's all artificial
>>
>>106776255
It's also half the price. You're not going with AMD because it's the fastest, you're going with them because they're the most cost-effective and will save your business money.
>>
>>106776523
>Half the speed
>Half the price
Were are the savings? You're paying more than that negligible difference in energy costs and dev time.
>>
>>106776877
Dev time is the same and electricity is grandfathered in.
>>
>>106776174
cuda is a good example of patent trolling
there's only so much you can do without infringing on some imaginary bullshit
>>
>>106776336
Honestly im glad Trump is getting rid of intel nvidia and AMD the new company's that will be replacing them will be 100% better
>>
>>106776523
but a business will lose money when amd crap will stop to work
more than that a business will have to hire own software developers
meanwhile nvidia provides support for that double price and cuda just works
>>
>>106777307
I hate AMD for the intentional gimping of their drivers but their hardware lasts. Nvidia hardware are ticking timebombs. I've had at least 7 nvidia GPUs prematurely die and all my AMD cards still work.
>>
how could it not be when it can't even work on windows
>>
>>106776174
Someone at Nvidia actually had the foresight to make sure that their GPUs could also be used for scientific computing workloads, which led to CUDA and a massive headstart.
AMD has just been horribly slow to catch up.
>>
>>106777729
> AMD has just been horribly slow to catch up.
they didnt try or start
>>
>>106777450
>I've had at least 7 Nvidia GPUs prematurely die
Do you recall the lifespans?
>>
>>106776174
>why is it eternally inferior to cuda?
every card since the 8000 series (2007) supported cuda, full stop. no further questions.
rocm? lol. not even amd knows what version works with which cards for how long, maybe.
>>
More than half of the nvidia engineers work on software. What's the percentage for AMD? ATI/AMD always was anemic with software.

https://www.linkedin.com/posts/naderlikeladder_nvidia-has-more-software-engineers-than-hardware-activity-7304987279251415040-jrUl
>>
>>106776174
Because CUDA started first. That's the only reason.
>>
>>106777729
No it's a very simple architecture problem there is no "catch up" "better choosers"
It's literally the memory and execution interleaving protocol
One of them is the best, that's cuda. Doesn't get any better
Problem
Patented
So you must take second best, and ironically, obviously, AMD actually took 3rd best to have room to grow
But you can't fuzz or shade between 3rd and 2nd, it's a single update step
And you go from 4 cycles per wave to 2. Nvidia has 1
Which means it's literally a 50% increase in speed.
Why the fuck would they do that today, when they could do it tomorrow
Same with apple and no headphones jacks. It's guaranteed money better to wait, due to inflation etc, but it ends up never happening, bc the rate at which you get more money is always increasing
>>
>>106776174
Don't care. Still buying AMD.
>>
>>106780149
Why are they still incapable of building a Linux kernel driver and software stack?
More engineers doesn't always mean better.
>>
>>106776883
time value of money, opportunity cost and first mover advantage
>>
>>106779263
>not even amd knows what version works with which cards for how long, maybe.
Refer to:
https://llvm.org/docs/AMDGPUUsage.html#processors

Anything supported by LLVM likely works with ROCm too.
>>
>>106785752
Not every business is looking to move first though. There is no doubt that NVIDIA is the market leader but most businesses will be perfectly content to follow rather than lead.

AI will change the course of business and NVIDIA will play a part in that but not every business will need the most expensive solution to do that.
>>
>>106785743
Dogfeeding their AI coding
>>
>>106776174
>steals your proprietary anti-freeware with SCALE
not my problem
>>
>>106777729
cuda isnt hardware, its just regular gpu cores you have no clue what youre talking about
if anything your criticisms only apply to intel for not properly implementing their oneapi plans and being too late
>>
>>106785771
that's the thing: as a business relying on gpgpu, you cannot bet on guesswork. shit has to work no matter what. nvidia offers just that, even if it's expensive af.
>>
I think the reason things are so bad is academic usage. Nvidia won long ago there, and stuff like AI is mostly following a pretty short route from research to commercial use. Models get dropped and implemented into tools within 24h a lot of the time. People build runtimes for this stuff to depend on CUDA, and with that, you tend to get automated setup for Nvidia hardware.
>t. attempting to get a ryzen AI APU to do useful local AI stuff and struggling for a multitude of reasons
>>
>>106776255
If only that were true
It doesn't even work with an out of box installation and requires FAFOing about to even work on windows
>>
>>106785743
While it's true that hardware companies tend to be shit at software, in the case of nvidia and Linux for home users, it's likely that nvidia doesn't give a shit about that market segment so they don't allocate resources to it beyond the bare minimum to have a driver that displays a desktop.
>>
>>106777648
yea no the windows SDK came out ages ago
in fact it worked on windows for like a year? before AMD even put out the sdk since it was secretly bundled in the drivers mostly just so blender could use it opencl style at runtime via hipew
and true cuda style single binary compilation was possible even at that stage if you knew enough about clang's offloading infrastructure
>>
>>106786840
So buy one of the supported Instinct GPUs then?
>>
>>106778729
They all fail within 6 months of being in my cum splash zone. AMD fans blow through my dried gunk. Nvidia fans always seize after 6 months of buildup. What a pitiful company.
>>
>>106788934
skill issue



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.