>>106785880
Running "scientific experiments in silico" means running simulations and data analyses. I can't tell you what exactly to simulate or analyse for: don't know the anti-aging field at all.
At a non-joke level, simulations tend to be pure command line applications that produce enormous reams of data. (If you're writing a simulator, store the output in an SQLite database instead of a pile of grotty binary files, please.) If you're serious about it, you'll need to run that stuff on a compute cluster, such as those owned by larger hospitals and universities.
Data analysis comes in two parts: qualitative and quantitative. The quantitative analysis parts are probably done in R or Python; they've got good tools for that stuff. The qualitative analyses (where you're deciding what quantitative analyses will give useful results and where to drill into the data pile) are probably the parts you'll find hardest; I've no idea how to do that part without plotting things on a graph. Perhaps transforming things into something audio will work; that's often neglected by most researchers. You'll probably need to get creative.

>>106786348
thanks!

>>106785880
Without some medical knowledge this would be very difficult to even know where to begin. You'd need some medical contacts at university or hospital doctors are always running research

What an awful affliction, thanks to God I am not blind. Jesus is lord.

Matthew 15:29-31
And Jesus having passed thence, came nigh unto the sea of Galilee, and having gone up to the mountain, he was sitting there, and there came to him great multitudes, having with them lame, blind, dumb, maimed, and many others, and they did cast them at the feet of Jesus, and he healed them, so that the multitudes did wonder, seeing dumb ones speaking, maimed whole, lame walking, and blind seeing; and they glorified the God of Israel.

>>106787219
There was a blind guy on penn and teller fool me show who could do karate and shit, and he basically said the worst disability is procrastination. Low key he wasn't wrong.

T. Procrastinator

I can appreciate where you're coming from OP. I. Lucky given I'm only afflicted with keratoconus but I know that need to seek own research to discover solutions through physicochemical simulation, given my background in chemical eng, computer simulation of processes and a mix of microbiology/biochem/computational genomics. Plus lab work I've done with protein studies. I reckon keep seeking information via research papers and if you're will work out ideas you can expand on from existing papers/publications. Often cutting edge stuff has 3 sets of trials before released upon patients after a decade of trials, maybe you might stumble on an obviously true cure/augmentation that is preclinical trial stage so that you don't wait ten years and try stage 1 solutions on yourself right now, given you accept the risks yourself. Sometimes that's how actual discoveries are made, not in hypothetical lab eureka moments but in people's home labs.

>>106787234
Based

File: Screen-Shot-2020-09-01-at(...).png (326 KB, 1024x499)

326 KB PNG

The human creature is quite complex, but there might be a way to simulate the metabolism, though that is also quite complex. See (lul) pic related.
Given the patients medical history and a recent blood test, a possible therapy should be possible to generate, to at least fix a big part of their health. That might give the patient 10 to 50 years more to live.

>>106787219
>seeing dumb ones speaking
That's just religious people in general, you don't need a miracle.