[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/g/ - Technology


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: wiki-captcha.png (165 KB, 1954x686)
165 KB
165 KB PNG
Wikipedia to require javascript and hcaptcha to edit.

Thanks to the increasing amount of vandals, spammers and political editors, along with a declining amount of administrators, Wikipedia is turning to AI-Captchas to reduce the workload, but closing the openness of the site even more. Wikipedia has already become more closed over the years by requiring Extended Confirmation for any controversial topic, now things will get even worse.

Jimbo's Vision of the Encyclopedia that Anyone can Edit is no more, expect Wikipedia to lock down even more soon, especially as they try to counter competition from Grok.
>>
The israel bots have moderator accounts, so what is the point?
Is there anyone, who isn't an israel shill, who is trying to bot?
Why would someone attempt that? All political subjects are locked and can only be edited by staff.
>>
>>106786989
There are hundreds of OpenSource captcha solutions out there, and they decide to use hCaptcha?
>>
Does anyone even use Wikislopia anymore?

>Yes I definitely WOULD like to read a 100-page article about some dead guy just to find the single piece of info I'm looking for.

Like JFC we have AI for a reason. Fucking use it.
>>
>>106786989
>Jimbo's Vision of the Encyclopedia that Anyone can Edit is no more
That has never been the reality, since practically its inception it has been flooded with mentally ill freaks who have nothing better to do all day than babysit articles and purge all wrongthink. Nobody sane is willing to sit there 365 days a year to justify the changes, and so eventually it'll get reverted.

The concept of a wiki is nice, but without an actual impartial authority, all you get is thought policing. It'd only work in a utopia without bad actors.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.