Can the FOSS ecosystem stand the influx of vibe coding?
>>106805011bump
>>106805011>extremely low-quality and unsaleable code>written by basement-dwelling losers that constantly hallucinate>not even the most cursory review or debugging is ever performedI would argue that vibe-coding is a FOSS maximiser.
>>106805011kekked
>>106805011Vibe coding is actually much more harmful to proprietary projects rather to open source, because open source code is actually reviewed.The only harm that's coming from AI is thousands of scrap bots that are bringing FOSS infrastructure down.
>>106805011given I haven't seen any actual FOSS vibe coded projects with real users, probably.
>>106805011>vibe codingfuck off, vibe coding is fucking shit and can't resolve tha important issues on the ecosystem, that crap cant even come up with finished things
I like vibe coding, it actually allows me to make money off tinkering>hurrrr it's low quality codeWe are waaaay past that point already sweetie
>>106805011We can withstand it easily. When the tide brings the turds floating in, just don't touch any of it and let the turds go back out with the ebb of the tide.IOW, just because some idiot proposes it doesn't mean you have to accept. You can literally go "this code is not good enough; go away and rewrite it yourself".