What's wrong with infinite scroll design? Why do anon hate it?
>>106808178I have infinite scroll just give pagination or load it all in at ones.
>>106808195>have*hate
Because a link I'm looking for is on the footer of the website but with infinite scroll I can't ever go down enough to click on it.yes, there are actually websites that do this.
>>106808216Fucking Twitter
>>106808178lags
>>106808178>page slows down due to vibe coded DOM bloat>refresh page>no way to get back to where you were or even remember where you were without scrolling and waiting for the dynamic content to load
It keeps people glued to their phone and addicted to the constant dopamine. It's called a "feed" for a reason.
>>106808178ENDLESS SLOP>ENDLESS SLOPENDLESS SLOP>ENDLESS SLOPENDLESS SLOP>ENDLESS SLOP
>>106808178because you cant have an ?page=2 url with it, and when you reload the page everything is lost
>>106808178All 3 of them are shit. Just load everything
>>106808847teh wholz intarnet
>>106808903>4chan>Loads everything relevant, instantly >Forums>Loads everything relevant, instantly>Shitty lazy loading infinite scroll garbage website>40 seconds to load 3 items, loading fails after you tried to see 6 more, have to refresh the page and you better not be interested in any of the current posts because they're lost forever to the algorithm hell
>>106808289>get dopamine rush by finding end of page>it never comesinto the trash
>>106808988try to load this and get back to melolcow dot farm slash snow slash catalog(thank you 4chan for your anti-spam rules, very cool)
>>106808178Corpo Tard sites like Google and Duck Duck Go only load like 10 items at a time it's obnoxious because you're always waiting for the new stuff to stream in. It should at least be 100 items at a time, and it should load the new stuff once I scroll past item #75.Pagination is fine.Infinite scroll is fine especially with page numbers in the margin.Load more is stupid.
>>106809049>Try to load this blatant CP-injecting IP-grabbing self-doxxing pedotroon glownigger websiteNo I don't think I will
>>106808178Because finding something is annoying.
I don't think there's even been a ui influenced by phones that's been good
Sometimes I don't want more options. And it's frequently poorly performant and buggy. Try as they might modern day jeet devs are never going to invalidate the importance of the "page" as a central building block of the internet.
>>106809130way to out yourself as a tech illiterate zoomer trying too hard to fit in
>>106808178Because it's not a component that is designed to help you find information. It is a component designed to bombard you with disposable slop you will consume once and never go back to or reference.
>>106809192Sorry for not falling for your scam
>>106809049damn that's pretty good
>>106808178Because there’s no way to return to where you were in the data and all the most popular data is painfully obvious and useless>me infinite scrolling>hey do you want to see ghostbusters >no what’s after that >oopsie infinite scroll reset to the top again oopsie doopsie Saar
