Are they for real?
>>106813841The fuck is an app assure manager and why does it sound like this person's spends most of their day making tik tak klocks
>>106813850He literally explains what he does.
>>106813841>to discuss moving them to Windows 11But that's not even what it says.
>>106813944We’re inundated with 3rd worlders who cannot read.
This seems like a giant waste of time and a nightmare to deal with, chances microsoft assigns a competent engineer to help with actual problems instead of a pajeet that will read from a script seem minimal to me
>>106813928Yeah well I'm not reading all that bullshit. Go cut your dick off tranny
>>106813944Copilot+ PCs are mentioned, so..?
I hope Code::Blocks will continue supporting XP, don't want this project to be ruined
>>106813841Any "Microsoft" email that starts with V- is a 3rd party 3rd world $4 an hour retardNever reply, delete the emails
>reading comprehension: the thread
If C::B will stop supporting XP I'm making a hard fork
>>106813841That's about ARM support, not Windows 11 specifically. Although in fairness Windows 11 for ARM already has extremely good x86_64 to ARM translation.
>>106813990It's the first sentence and it's not even that long. How short is your attention span?
>>106813841This email has to be satire? If not it's pretty funny.>"fastrack center">some other department>managerNo wonder why these companies are so ineffective and dumb. It's HR person's wet dream.
>>106813944>>106813953>>106813841yeah, OP is a retard and can't read.
>>106814014I'm making 120k as a v- I do miss the ESPP and perks+ though, will try to get back in eventually if the rto rape goes away
>>106813841sounds like somebody's not hitting their KPIs
I looked him up on linkedin and he even looks like a jeet
>>106814851nta but I'm not reading work emails while I procrastinate at work, do better
>>106813973I have experience with this program, they actually fixed a bug in their x64-on-ARM64 translation layer for me
>>106814965OP meant Microsoft are trying to make CodeBlocks cut off XP support
So will M$ provide ARM build environments for your application too?
>>106815010you're retarded lmao
>>106813841i worked with that guy
>Stable release: 25.03 / 31 March 2025how is Code::Blocks even still relevant in 2025? I already thought it was abandonware meme back in like 2014 when we had to use it in high school for babby's first for-loop tier programswho is this software aimed at?
I'm from /x/ and all through October I will cast black magic spells to make all devs drop support for Windows 10/11 and support only 7 and XP (and WINE). The apocalypse will happen on Halloween. See you in November.
>>106816335>who is this software aimed at?gigachads
>>106813841seems normal. accept the meeting. explain that you'd love to support arm, but don't have any arm equipment. if you get lucky they'll supply some.
>>106815502Probably for juuuuust long enough that you build a small user base on ARM, and then pull the funding leaving you to pay your own way or get review bombed by users whose software stopped updating.They probably even have mathematical models to tell them exactly when the tipping point is for each grant recipient.
>>106816335people who don't like proprietary shit
What are the chances Microsoft won't sign your app if it doesn't support ARM in the near future? Sounds pety but is in the realm of possibility for this shitty company.
