Cutting off 90% of the internet from AI
>>106816149This happened a while ago. I remember when Google returned 10s of millions of results per query
>>106816149Even other search engines don't seem like they return more than a few pages of results. Either the internet really is dead and most sites are gone, or they hide results, or both. Both are terrifying.
>>106816149old news
Gen-Zers are too retarded to understand this.
>>106816149It hasn't been a thing for ages DOE
>>106816287>Either the internet really is dead and most sites are goneThey're not gone. t. connoisseur of websites which google will not yield direct results for.
>>106816174What page did it stop at? 34? It's like playing Ocarina of Time as an adult and realizing Hyrule Field is the size of your backyard.
>>106816149>GoogleHas the worst AI imaginable.If you google something it can give you an irrelevant response generated by AI and if you try to 'dive deeper' sometimes instead of giving you a shitty AI response it will give you a list of irrelevant google search results (basically its AI when you want a google search and its a google search when you want an AI)Also i find it funny how i can literally just call it a retarded nigger and its like "Kicking off 15 searches, Looking at 184 sites" as you wait for a response; I doubt its doing any of that
>>106817207I just did a random search ("how to juggle") and Google gave me 21 pages of results.
>>106816149They use cached results.
>>106816174> returned 10s of millions of results per queryAnything is possible if you lie
Google has no usecase besides looking local opening hours. Its good at this but for nothing else really
>>106817207>>106819748Guessing you were not alive back then because you could click through the results for hours. Iterations of change have eventually gotten to where it is now.
>>106817249ChatGPT does the same "scanning website" but it doesn't as you said. Really easy to test if you're using some api on github and it's out of date telling you about the old version, link the new one and it has no clue. Copy paste the new code in and they know immediately
>>106817190>t. connoisseur of websites which google will not yield direct results for.And how do you find such sites?
>>106817190>>106821244Yeah, i also want to know, because using quotations and time limitations doesn't work in finding the specific shit i used to be able to get.Is there some other serach engine out there that isn't shit or do i need to start manually entering URLs with words i thought would be interesting like i used to do back in the 90s?
If you google "iPhone 7" it stops giving results after 12 pages. 15 if you click "repeat the search with the omitted results included."
