Why is WEBP sometimes able to achieve more than 20-30% lower file size compared to JPG in photographic images?When aiming for an SS2 of 60/medium quality of picrel, WEBP does this at ~80KB but JPG requires ~200KB which means the former is achieving ~60% lower file size. It doesn't make any sense because VP8 is optimized for cartoons with large flat surfaces with few colors, right?Or I guess another way to put it is: What makes picrel cursed for JPG? https://files.catbox.moe/lbcizc.webp
Here's the ~200KB JPG. I was expecting the WEBP was going to knock off 10, maybe 20KB from the file size, not 100+ KB.
Testing ~140KB jpegli encode. This also scored 60 SS2.
It failed...WTF, 4chan doesn't support jpegli images?
lossy formats are obsolete, use lossless
>>106831625I got a negative SS2 score with this...
>>106831951lower is better, like par in bowling