>>106832643
I am home with nixos and systembased.

File: 1755212272243843.jpg (1.94 MB, 3600x2735)

1.94 MB JPG

>>106832656
>I am home with nixos and systembased.

>pacman
Sorry, arch is gay and pacman is trans.

>>106832643
artix, xlibre, xfce. I'm thinkin I'm home

File: gigachad-sensei-doodle-se(...).png (82 KB, 500x489)

82 KB PNG

>>106832830
are you me?

>>106832905
ah a fellow anon with good taste, greetings

>>106832830
this, but devuan

>>106833092
i've not used devuan but maybe i'll check it out on their next release

Arch is a piece of shit that needs random problems fixes frequently and you're telling me to use a freetarded version of arch that breaks even more due to it not having systemd?

if you are going to go systemd-free devuan is the superior choice

two paths:
homosexual path -> sysvinit , xlibre , fvwm/xfce
tranny path -> systemd, wayland, hyprland

>>106833270
artix and devuan are best friends imo. i've tried artix too before, i just prefer the less updates necessary of devuan on a device that doesn't need bleeding edge. also, i think the devuan release names can't be beat.

>>106833298
arch doesn't break you are just retarded. the one major time arch "broke" was a year ago where they changed how they package the linux firmware crap and really it was working as intended and they had given weeks notice. artix didnt even have this issue because they didnt change how they package it

>>106832905
a gachafaggot? no

>>106833092
>>106833447
Can you use debian repo with devuan?

File: 1686015377885623.jpg (237 KB, 853x1000)

237 KB JPG

i use arch with gnome and gdm. my packages are new and my system is stable. i am not a tinker tranny and everything just works.

>>106833497
>Devuan package repositories are exclusive. Other repositories, including Debian, Ubuntu, Mint etc, should not be used directly.
i've never used debian repos but assuming your package doesn't have systemd dependencies, it should probably work on devuan?

>>106833470
I said "needs problems fixed" not complete breakage. There will always be a problem to fix whether that is pacman itself or Xorg or the dm no longer functioning and needing to go to the TTY to fix things

>thread made by init faggots
>too technologically illiterate to remove systemd themselves
>have to use a distro made by another man like some type of distro cuck
>all this despite both debian and arch having wiki entries on how to migrate init
people who didnt like systemd used to be smart and talented. now they're gay and useless.
dont even install gentoo, you will no doubt shit up my favorite distro as well.

uhoh cry baby meltie , dont touch xer favorite toys guys you'll ruin them!

>xer
use real pronouns homo.
>you'll ruin them!
only thing you will ruin is the community by demanding we use your made up pronouns. im confident you cant install it because you cant even read a how-to to change pid1

>>106833725
>Xorg or the dm no longer functioning and needing to go to the TTY to fix things
this never happens, if it does 99.9% of the time it is a user error not archs fault. it is only considered unstable because retards have issues and blame arch. if it really did require constant maintanence that would be insane

File: 1758510343813.jpg (22 KB, 554x554)

22 KB JPG

>>106833857
>>106833920
I just don't care and I will continue to use Artix, please plug your leaky clitty.

i bet you will continue to suck cock too faggot

init freedom is important to me, for many reasons including battery life and performance in older hardware, so why would i not choose a distro that has dedicated support to it instead of chopping out a mono-init operating system with hardly any support or documentation?

>just change the init system yourself and use the artix package repos bro
wouldnt this just be the same as installing artix just will more steps? i dont get it

I tried to.. It doesn't have dual booting w/secure boot figured out

>init freedom
>probably only used default on whatever init protest distro you've used
>for many reasons including battery life and performance in older hardware
youve never compared any
>so why would i not choose a distro that has hardly any support or documentation?
fixed that last sentence bro. thank me later.
>>106833989
>just change the init system yourself and use the artix package repos bro
wouldnt this just be the same as installing artix just will more steps? i dont get it
if that greentext is what i actually said i can see why you wouldnrt get it. good thing i didnt even mention fartix repos.

nooo dont use that software you fucking faggots!!!
cry baby still screaming into the void! must be the estrogen XD

>>106834018
don't tell me i've never compared any distros, stop gaslighting yourself and everyone itt

>>106834034
>nooo dont use that software you fucking faggots!!!
now you're starting to get the picture
except you're incapable of using anything else.
>>106834041
>stop gaslighting
troonspeak

I tried to.. It doesn't have dual booting w/secure boot figured out

just use regular arch like a normal human being...
>>106834057
>filtered by sbctl

kys artix pedo

File: 1759836353080492.png (797 KB, 1183x1024)

797 KB PNG

Wouldn't cirno be a better mascot for artix than nix?

love yourself artix friend

File: 1750712869692685.png (913 KB, 1265x1745)

913 KB PNG

>>106834303
I thought Cirno was Plan 9

File: rdp artix linux android r(...).png (1.54 MB, 1440x3200)

1.54 MB PNG

I use the Remote Desktop Manager Android app to remotely access the Artix Linux distro on my phone.

>>106833092
i thought the out of date packages meme was overblown, but even excalibur doesnt package xpdf 4 lmao and even the server install is full of bloat compared to artix

>>106833857
>pretending to be smart while using a package manager written in python
typical gentroon

File: Screenshot From 2025-10-0(...).png (548 KB, 3072x1920)

548 KB PNG

>>106833589
dangerously based