Here's a stance we can all agree with regardless of nationality, race, hardware or programming language. We need to put the guy who invented the webp format into whatever jail has the most rape and then after 20 years of rape he gets death by firing squad
>>106845771Why?
>>106845771I can agree with thatFuck webp
because 4chan is too retarded to implement it?you don't have a problem with webms, which are better than mp4s
>>106845771*irregardless
>>106845771I don't care as much anymore because 4chanxt autoconverts them
>>106845771I genuinely hate webp
>>1068457714chanxt and stop caring auto converts files. I don't even pay attention to it anymore. not aure you actually care either and arent just hoping for easy (You)
>>106845779Educate yourself>>106845796Retard, you have to go out of your way to make webp not supported>>106845831Bassed
>>106845771Now avif is the new webp. It's even worse.
>>106846000>Educate yourselfSure I'll just google "why does that one anon on 4chan hate the webp file format"
>>106845771This is a good thread.A lot of "people" need to be lynched for forcing bad standards on the world.
>>1068457714chan is the only site/app I use that doesn't support webp. Even Shitney Vegas supported webp 12 years ago.
>>106847077How is webp a bad standard? It's not the standard's fault that proprietary shitware and abandoned imageboard are stuck in the early 00's when it comes to image support.
>>106845779>>106845796>>106845805>>106845814>>106847094>>106847173Most anons here probably don't even know the difference between YUV and RGB let alone that webp can use both. Kinda sad given how this is supposedly a "technology" board. I really miss when the internet was mostly inhabited to whites.t. spic who had a myspace
Webp is good but 4chan doesn't support it. If it was bad then 99.9999% of websites wouldn't use it.
I would have no problem with webp if it didn't fucking pretend to be a jpg all the time
It's weird how many sites that use webp will also have tons of photos in png.
>>106847230Pay attention to the posts you quote, you stupid cocksucker.
>>106845771>GIF or PNG that can only be found on fandom.>Right-click, save as GIF/PNG>Try to upload or open it.>GIF is a static image>SORRY THIS WEBSITE DOESN@T SUPPORT WEBP>....Cry
>>106848411link?Now web browser often download webp images even if the link says png/jpg. But almost always you can still download the png/jpg image (or gif) by downloading it with an http client.
>>106847230normal people:>if it aint broke dont fix itwebdev subhumans:>if it aint broke fix it untill it is
>webp>heic>heif>jfif>avifpure cancer
>>106845796tech is a means to an endif it doesn't serve my end (shitposting), of what use is it?
>>106845771> .TIFFAm I forgotten?
>>106848611The alternative is to 100% abandon RGB or YUV for images. Are you really ready for that?
99.9999999999% of all webp images were needlessly converted from png, jpeg, or gif in a desperate attempt to make .webp a thing.It’s never becoming a thing.
>>106846000>Retard, you have to go out of your way to make webp not supportedCorrect, if you support .webm then you're one button press from supporting .webp, any website not supporting one but not the other is moronic.Unrelated to anything, how come the dumbest posts on this website are coming from the very same people calling others retarded? And I don't mean just /g/, but most boards.
>>106848779>gifnigga webp is vastly superior to gifs
>>106848759> “if you don’t use webp I’m going to cut myself”Go for it. Please record it.
>>106848843No, I mean that actually is the future awaiting us. The AVIFfags believe in a YUV future and the JXLfags believe in an RGB future.Webp exists because the internet hasn't decided on what the image format of the future is yet.
>>106848759Why do spergs feel the need to push their weekly fixation on everybody else? Yuv vs rgb doesn't matter, they get converted to each other when it matters.
>>106849155BUT it do.limited range 4:2:0 YUVLITERALLYcan't be accurately converted to RGB
>>106848843>if you don’t use webp I’m going to cut myself”Webp truly is the BPD girlfriend of image files. Imagine my surprise.
>>106849217>when you compress an image, it loses fidelitywtf why has nobody realized this before?
>>106845771webp is good though.
>>106849241>What is lossless compression
>>106848641Are these hebrew names?
>>106848684>tech is a means to an endYes, but often that end is more means
What exactly was *.webm invented for ? what problem does it solve ? what purpose does it even serve ?
>>106850802The same for *.webp
>>106845771OP, I am a contrarian bitch that likes to argue for the sake of it and actively look through the catalogue for threads to do it in, but this time, this one time, WE ARE FUCKING AGREEMENT 200%. I hate, HATE, despise to the core of my being, the absolute piece of shit that made webp. He deserves all the worst things that can happen to a human being. FUCK THAT GUY, HIS FAMILY AND EVERYONE GENETICALLY RELATED TO HIM. DIE INA FIRE YOU ABSOLUTE SUBHUMAN FILTH.
>>106850934I was SEETHING so much I made fucking typos like a jeet. Fuck me.
>>106850934ITT: low IQs
>>106850956Cope.
There's nothing wrong with webm / webp. You're just mad because 4chan doesn't support it, and when you send a webm to an iPhone it doesn't work. Fight the real enemy
This thread is very Indian.
>>106849631wtf didn't that crane pick up remains of a blownup nuclear power plant and these heckin' whores are sitting on it?
>>106849631Reddit philosophy.
OP would be ranting about webm right now if 4chan had not introduced support for it
>>106850802Webm is google being a kike to bigger kikes (mpeg-la). It's the kike wars but somehow it ended up benefiting common folk like us because now you no longer have to pay to use media codecs.Actually you no longer have to pay to use H264/JPG because patents have expired long ago but they both suck compared to webp and webms made with VP9.
>>106845771Literally the only thing wrong with webp is that 4chan doesn't support it.
