That will be 20k British Pounds plus 100 tip for every day of no compliance Mr. 4chan.
But 4chan users support gay pride! Why would they do this???It's okay to be gay!!
>>106873750I still don't understand how this is related to some foreign country's laws. Britain should just filter 4chan like they already did with piratebay etc over 10 years ago. This smells so fishy.
>allegedly 20K per day>now down to 100
>>106873773that's what they will do once 4chan refuses to payplus put pressure on every business that deals with 4chan like coinbase (4chan uses this for crypto payments) to drop 4chancoinbase will drop 4chan because they actually have more important business in the UK than some neet website
>>106873773countries have many reciprocal laws and laws which can be called on by foreign/outside parties. not everywhere and i would guess the USA 1A trumps everything. i worked for a hong kong company and we had EU GDPR things we had to follow even though the EU had no jurisdiction there were HK regulations which enforced the EU GDPR and made some of it applicable. this was not direct HK GDPR but a reciprocal "EU passed a law and you have responsibilities under X and Y". ignoring 4chan is american, the UK law does reach farther than the UK border because countries join together to fuck people.
>>106873773The blue boards should be fine, just do it like 4channel used to do and hide the NSFW boards
>>106873750Reminder this law is weighted in favour of big social media platforms which is where kids are seeing all the harmful content and small platforms like 4chan and regular old forums are suffering because the big guys can bribe/comply their way through all the additional costs and kill all the competition.
>>106873805>that's what they will do once 4chan refuses to payAnd that's what'll happen. The UK is free to block 4chan if they want, but 4chan isn't a company within UK jurisdiction.
https://x.com/UnderSecPDis the pointman on getting US to tell England to fuck off
>>106873750If you think this is bad they are putting kids in front of cameras saying things like "I don't feel safe unless I know who people are on the internet" and pushing the idea that your digital ID should be required for all social media and sites you can post on.
>>106873890That's true of basically all regulations, and in fact is the actual intended purpose.