Why people who refuse to learn about IPv6 are the most vocal? We would bid farewell to IPv4 if it weren't for those retards.
>>106931692>Why people who refuse to learn about IPv6 are the most vocal?Vocal idiots are common in every field>We would bid farewell to IPv4 if it weren't for those retardsRealistically, no we wouldn't
ipv6 is not for humans, it's for ai robots
don't want it, don't need it
>why dont people want a jewish barcode assigned to all of their machines?
>CVE-2024-38063Keep in mind that this was 2024; we are not ready yet.
though it is true that we don't need ipv6, but y'all talk about it like it's the devil.
>>106931692Why did they limit IPv6 to only 128bits.If they had gone with 512bits we could have done so much more with it. Unfortunately they gimped us with their stingy limited attitude.I guess maybe it made sense back in the 90s to limit it, but in retrospect it ruined all reason to even adopt it.
>>106931692Kek, even IPv6 memes are too long to read
>>106932248>done so much morename 2 things
>>106932223>CVE-2024-38063>Microshit hires jeets >jeets write vulnerable code>somehow that proves IPv6 is not ready
>>106932315post desktop i'll wait
>>106932315why are frogposters always so smug? I bought an additional windows laptop for my gf (who is mac curious) just now just to know I spited one of you
>>106931692My ISP doesn't support v6
Network Card > Protocols > IPV6 > Disable
>>106932868My ISP gives a /64
Use case for IPv6? What makes you think browns on the internet is a metric?
>implying that CG NAT is badAre you retarded? NAT is good if you don't want to get hacked
is there a use case for an imageboard which only accepts connections from ipv6 enabled source?
>>106935844Add this one to the image, OP.
>>106935857Yeah getting spammed to death because IPV6 has a gazillion more IPs to ban evade with
>ipv6cringelennial unc tech lmao frong we need ipv16 with 2048-bit addresses so that every smart anal plug can have an entire ipv4 pool equivalent reserved for it's communication needs no cap
>>106931692We just had this thread. Unemployed IPv6 lintroon hobbyists got utterly destroyed and humiliated by anons who actually work in IT (not just tinker with their troonix shitboxes in moms basement). The only "people" who shill IPv6 are deranged linuxoids, who desperately need to show off to other linuxoids, that they can wireguard into their "homelab". These troglodytes are terrified that their mom might not want to pay for a static public IP. In the previous thread, we already established that static public IPs should have been a paid service from the start. This would cause many archxisters to commit sudoku, but also would save countless public IPs (which are actually useful to society).
>>106932262
