How would you define the AI bubble bursting?
>>106934186When companies who fired people miss earnings and report losses compared to compared to companies who hired people and didn't suffer losses and hit their targets.They fired people because they think AI is automating stuff. But it's not.
>>106934186Gaming GPUs become affordable again.
When the financial system implodes like a turd.
>>106934186Believe it or not, I have not used AI beyond a couple of demos at the beginning of public release. I don't have plans to use it. I don't care for it. I want the entire facade to collapse. Markets to crash. Globohomo apparatuses to burn.
>>106934186All companies that don't have their own model going bankrupt.
>>106934186Being able to purchase a B200 for ten bucks at a data centre fire sale.
>>106934266Lmao
>>106934186AI goon super cheap
>>106934186Part of it is up to us to boycott products with any kind of AI keywords and especially vibeware. Have some impulse control.
>>106934186Sam Altman moving to Israel
>>106938565I mean there's already no consumer spending lol$13b in AI spending (Down from last year) against trillions in investments
>>106934186When AI companies are forced to generate profits instead of riding on seemingly infinite investment capital and the good graces of the government.
>>106934186Buy low
I think people are looking at the wrong angle to define the bubble popping. The real problem is with the people financing itSoft Bank has taken on over a hundred billion in debt just to finance AI stocks. Eventually that debt is going to mature and without any return on that investment they're going to have to sell, and the blood in the water will make the stocks worthless
>>106934186The economy bubble bursts and AI gets more investment to cut costs.
>>106934186One or the big corps goes bankrupt and drags 10 others with it, leading to even more companies going bankrupt because investors want their monies back. 90+% of """ai""" product (aka gpt wrappers) are gone with some surviving because they actually had paying customers and weren't operating at a loss (and didn't rely on some other product)
>>106939522Dont bother. This board is full of underagers, low IQ dunning-kruger aspies on disability and turd worlders whose understanding of muh economy is shitflinging on /pol/ with GDP comparison infographics. See: the rest of the replies in this thread.
>>106939666I enjoy going on /g/ for specifically this reason
>>106939666why are you here then mister super smart? just leave this website
