my tranny coworkers keep insisting that AI is a "bubble," how do i prove them wrong?
>internetexplorerAnd the troons are right, it is a bubble. There's no such thing as AGI.
>>106951137You're dumber than those trannies
people say bubble these days like they said cloud when it first came out. they have no fucking clue what they mean, they just parrot what they favorite youtuber is saying
>>106951137The troon is right, it is a bubble. Most people investing into it will lose a lot of money. But just like the internet became a major part of our life today after the dotcom Bubble so will LVMs.
>>106951137The only company that is making money off AI is on the hardware side and it's NVIDIA.So take a guess fuck
I dunno ask Grok It might be a bubble but that doesn't mean it is going away. Tech was a bubble in the early 00s but we still have technology companies today, long after the bubble burst. Housing was and is a bubble, but we still have houses. Tulips were a bubble in The Netherlands but we still have them now, etc.
>>106951137Trans people and AI shills belong in the same oven.And yes, it is a bubble.Also even though it is clearly overrated, whether or not is a giant bubble got nothing to do with how useful or advanced the technology is.
>>106951137Nature already proved them wrong. And once they understand that themselves, you'll get new coworkers.
>>106951176>>106951178pottery
This is exponential, we are still at the best moment, but in 10 years, things are going to get ugly.
>>106951137>themYWNBAW
>>106951213trannies seething Trump bringing in AGI utopia instead of their marxist nonsense
>>106951137The popping will be delivered so gently and so slowly it will be as if nothing ever happened, then shit gets repackaged and sold again.
>>106951137
>>106951226>"AGI utopia">look inside>social credit system
>>106951243even if, let's entertain it, who's making it happen tho? sure as fuck don't look like commie economics is building AGI
>>106951219>This is exponentialHow do you figure? No nontrivial breakthrough has been discovered in about 8 years despite the flood of glorified blog posts spammed to Arxiv. And all the training data is used up. And all new training data is polluted. And nobody has made any money off AI yet. The biggest players are cutting costs and backtracking. Copyright lawsuits are closing in from all sides. Not to mention the current valuations of several of these companies include literally 1.5 TRILLION dollars of data centers that have not been built and the money to build them does not exist anywhere. Calling it a bubble is too kind it's a bomb. The US dollar has already lost 16% of its value since Trump took office, when this goes off it'll be USSR collapse level bad.
>>106951281Dude, chill. Two or three versions of ChatGPT down the line we will have AGI and everything will be a-okay.
>give LLM complete core MORK BORG rulebook in both PDF and plain text format>ask it to read it and ingest the information so it can refer to the rules on the fly>it says it did/does>ask it something simple like how to generate a character of a specific class>gets it wrong 100% of the time, if I try to correct it, it either tells me I’m right and it’s wrong, then gives me correct information (it’s still completely wrong)>explicitly tell it to reference the plain text I gave it of how that class works>it gaslights me and tells me I never gave it text about that>scroll up 2 messages>I did>ask it to GM a game of MORK BORG>doesn’t know how to run simple rules like initiative, gaslights me and tells me there are no rules for initiative in MORK BORG (there are, they are plainly stated in the core rule book)>consistently gets basic rules like how to roll for stats wrong>if I correct it, it confirms I’m right that it’s wrong, claims it’s correcting itself and spits out a new response which is still wrong and using the same wrong knowledge/assumptions>if I explicitly give it the correct rules and process in a new message and tell it to ONLY use that ruleset for rolling something specific, it says it will, gives me a new response using the newly specified ruleset that it should ONLY use (it’s still using the old incorrect assumed ruleset, insists it’s using the new one)>if I push it and tell it it’s still using the old incorrect rules that it hallucinated or pulled from some erroneous source, it gaslights me >constantly hallucinates while DMing and not in a good way, in a way that breaks the game ruleset or balanceTried with GPT, Gemini, and Grok.All AI is a fucking meme flop. Can’t read. Can’t follow simple instructions.
>>106951651Hell even “bespoke” LLMs explicitly made for running TTRPG content can’t do it write. Loom, which I’m assuming is just chatGPT in a wrapper, forgets something it told you two messages ago, jumps from location to location erroneously, will give you information or tell you you are somewhere, and then deny it and tell you you don’t have access to that information or location yet, etc.It’s really laughable. Everyone says their LLM is a genius and none of them can read, follow basic instruction, or properly remember when it’s something more complex than an arbitrary tag like a name or date or color. All they can do is spit out literal vomit slop. Gemini never reads information right, when it pops up at the top of Google it is ALWAYS wrong. Literally every single time it asserts at least ONE completely incorrect or hallucinated thing while directly citing and linking you to a source that contradicts what it’s saying, meaning it literally cannot read and reason or think critically. It’s all fucking meme slop meant to impress retarded executives and literal brainlets who can’t do any thinking, writing, or researching on their own. They don’t know how to do it, so the see an “AI” do it and are immediately impressed with the result because they literally don’t know any better and don’t know what kinds of results they can get from doing anything they ask an “AI” to do when they do it themselves with some modicum of experience or skill. This applies especially to big money and execs, which is why so much money is being dumped into this slop. They hear the buzzwords and dump the money, they can’t actually personally verify whether the product is good or not, because they’re too fucking stupid.It would be REALLY fucking cool if you could give an LLM a TTRPG ruleset and oracles, and have it GM and generate content on the fly. But they can’t. And Sam Altman is huffing his farts while investors clap.
>>106951137>how do i prove them wrong?you can't because the trannies are right
>>106951137>working at a company with trannies
>>10695128source?
fun fact:80% people claim AI is a bubble, 0% short it
>>106951137how can you prove them wrong?the only option is to wait
>>106954529instead of shorting they're investing in companies, assets with lower than usual AI hype exposure
>>106951137You don't, just do your shit and go home.
>>106951137>tranny coworkers>sholy hellhole, glad I work with white boomers
>>106954578it's just his brainrot speaking in buzzwords i believe
>>106951137dumb frogposter
>>106951137Tell them to short Nvidia.
People were writing blank checks to sock puppets selling dog food online during dotcom. Nvidia might die, but AI isn't going anywhere. You'd have to be absolutely delusional to think otherwise. People are shitting their pants and burying their heads in the sand because they know they will be out of a job soon.
>>106951137DROWN THEM IN SLOP
>>106951137>my tranny coworkers keep insisting that AI is a "bubble," how do i prove them wrong?with the absolute amount of money currently being poured in right now- it definitely 1000% is.will there eventually be a few winners just like after the dotcom crash? yes. but right now the amount of money being pumped in and the investments being returned (read, nothing), it will all come crashing down. the question is just when.when you are increasing the value of companies by just adding "ai" to whatever shitty product they are selling "ai lightbulbs!!" it is a fucking bubble.
Aren't you also a tranny, froggie?
>>106954529You can’t short it, retardNone of the AI companies are publicly traded And shorting nvidia is shooting yourself in the foot
>>106951137Trannies are luddites. We already know this. Plus, most coders are trannies (codetrannies)
>>106951137Buy nvidia, amd, etc and be rich while they are poor
>>106954529Most people with at least the 80 IQ required to notice that AI is a bubble also can recognize that timing the market is a fool's errand.
>>106951264>This total nothing overturned Trump gov is in control of the AGIPeter Thiel and the rest of globohomo support the faggotry. Say goodbye to rights.
>>106951137It is a bubble. Even NVIDIA has a P/E value over 50 and they're the ones making money.
>>106954529It turns out that you're retarded.If you think you've identified a bubble, then the best strategy is actually to buy in and make easy money.You just don't want to end up holding the bag when it bursts.
>>1069511371990s internet. That is where AI is. They're fucking moronically blinded by their "art"
when the trannies are the sober conservative realists in the convo...
>>106951137haha OP I love froggo XD
