If you don't have an 8K monitor you're living in the past, this thing makes 4k look like 720p
why
>>106953025colorimeter for self calibration if i am to guess
>>106952974Wouldn't you basically have to put your face up to the screen to tell the difference?
>>106952974the cool thing about 8k is that it has perfect integer scaling for pretty much every standard resolution including 1440p.
what will they sell after that?
>>10695312916k
>>106953048at a 2 foot distance you are looking at about 110 pixels per degree which is close to the limit for human vision
>>106953044neat>>106953095density is so high at that point integer scaling almost doesn't matter
>>1069529741440p is the bar, anything over is just not needed on a 27" monitor. And this isn't just pleb talk, poor man cope as I'm the Duke of Edinburgh.
>>106952974>Don't ask questions>Just consume slop>And then get excited for newer slopkys
>>106953529I love how the board poors believe this convinces anyone not to buy stuff
>>106953570So tell us which (((sponsor))) paid you to shill out this garbage
>4k monitor cheap as balls>8k 1000% more and can't tell the difference The reason nobody makes this shit and it hasn't gone mainstream is because 4k is the sweetspot of fidelity/cost for the limits of the human eye. 8k is retarded
>>106953578>lol he pulled out the paid shill responsedo you have a saved .txt file with a list of retarded replies to post? Go back to herding your village goats you smelly cunt
>>106952974almost nothing supports 8k right now
>>106952974Sure, but there's about over a billion 1080p monitors to choose from (new & used), and you're damn right I bought a 1080p monitor in the year of our lord 2000 + 25. Life is good.
>>106952974>60hzdisgusting
>>106953771Which OS doesn't support 8k?
>>106953200cool, i can turn off antialiasing now
>>106954133Not really. You can see aliasing on 8k
>>106954214huhh? explain yourself.
>>106952974>Implying I want to live in the present
>>106953844even if your OS does, there's hardly any content actually produced in 8K
>>106954540you can still see aliasing in 8k. What part do you need explaining?
>>106953828human eye can't see more than 24hz
Would be nice to have phone tier image quality (>=300DPI) on the big screen.
why hasn't Dell made a new 8K monitor? This thing is from 2017
>>106954703Lol I saw this post disappear and re-appear here with both tabs open next to each other: >>106954675
>>106954754I seen it too lol
>>106954754>>106954765yeah i jeeted out for a mini don't have anybody to check my posts before I deploy unlike the AWS engineers
>>106953305no fair my monitor doesn't get boners
i have 2K @144hz gaming ips monitordo i need more?
I do like that both 1440p and 2160p divide evenly into 4320p so that you have more resolution options for games.
>>106953044>colorimeter for self calibration if i am to guessdont those degrade after a few years? why would you want it built into the screen? by the time its time to calibrate again, the color filters or whatever will already be expired
>>106954628>human eye can't see more than 24hzyeah but i have two eyes
>>106952974I wanted something that can read all scans upto 1200DPI of manga even 2 page spreads at full resolution and turns out even 8K wasn't enough so I'll wait for 16K.
I just recently upgraded to a 1440p monitor from 1600x900.
>>106955076it's a nice upgrade
>>106955084It is. Unfortunately, watching the boatload of 720p porn i downloaded on it looks like it was filmed for ants
>>106952974>such amazing 16.7ms persistence blur
>>106955013You calibrate at the very least every few months and immediately when your ambient light situation changes.
>>106953739Phones have 460 PPI but apparently >137 (4k 32") for a monitor is "retarded"?
>>106953129120hz@8k would be next.
>>106955467>120hz@8k would be nextThat will never happen.>yes it--IT. WILL. NEVER. HAPPEN. GPUS CANNOT RENDER 120FPS @ 8K. IF THEY DID THEN YOUR SETTINGS ARE LOW EVERYTHING.IT. WILL. NOT. HAPPEN.IT. WILL. NOT. BE. USABLE. FOR. ANYTHING. ANYONE. WOULD. DO. FOR. PRODUCTIVITY. OR. GAMING. WITHOUT. GIMPING. TO. MINIMUM. GRAPHICS. QUALITY.
>>106952974>you're living in the pastyeah i still draw on old screenless wacom tablet and 1080p shitty monitor. Even my photoshop is 13 years old.I tired new stuff but it was feeling wierd to use.
>>106955536nvidia is refreshing yearly now. in 10 years gpus will grow faster than they did 2000->2010
>>106955652This is how I know the US is not only in a reccession, but also a 3rd world country in terms of tech.The average chinese guy has a 4k monitor.
>>106955745newer cards are barely any better than older ones
>>106955536Just upscale+framegen from 720p@30fps, ez.
>>106955786if you game at 1080p yes, that's not how GPUs work.
>>106955536>it can't do it>well it can if you do this>but it can't do itate you genuinely retarded?
>>106952974what's the frame buffer size for that resolution? triple buffered
>>106955860It actually still couldn't except in old games or with one of those mods that makes the graphics look like potato so they can run on a potato.
>>106955376You hold your phone to your face because everything is so small. You don't do thst with a monitor.
>>106955911>actually it can't>well it can>but it can'tdo you listen to yourself?
>>106955860SAAR PLS USE DLLSMEAR TECH WITH LATEST NSHITIA CARD THANK YOU KINDLY
>>106952974I hate big monitors, I prefer 19 inch ones. Where can I find 19" 8K monitors?
>>106952974>I can't wait for all the artifact-ing in my media library
>>106955951Honestly it seems like finding a high-res monitor below 27-30" is a hard task these days, and if you're lucky enough it could be 23/24".I get why there's more of a market for larger monitors, but the possibility of sharp pixel density on a high-res small monitor would be incredible.
>>106955926Why did I even bother writing a genuine reply.
>>106955013degrade? aren't they just a prism with a 1d sensor?
>>106956013If that was genuine, then you ate genuinely retarded.>say it can't happen>explain how it can happen>say again it can't happen
>>106956049SHITTY QUALITY? THAT IS WHAT YOU THINK IS USEABLE?
Wtf would you even do with 8KI can barely use 4K on a 32" monitorI'd need a wall TV to use 8K
>>106955013>dont those degrade after a few years?You're supposed to buy a new screen after 24 months of use anyhow.Because capitalism and shit.
>>106956129skill issue
>>106952974i don't need goyslop resolutions, 1080p is enough
>>106953129Human eye can't see past 60K
>>106953512Bro!I Yused to be Duke of YorkBut they won't let me be no more.
>>106952974I have a 28” 3840x2560 monitor and use it at 200% scaling because everything is too small to read comfortably otherwise... a small 8K display seems kinda dumb as I'd have to scale that even more to make it usable, not really making use of the resolution to give me more workspace.
>>106954556/thread
>>106953512>1440pThis is the poorfag pants on head retarded tier, you will need to upscale 1080p media wich look subpar or waste storage downscaling 4k shit.
nah, 1080p for my gaming monitor, 1200p elsewhere because 16:10 is objectively the best aspect ratiohigh resolutions are a meme
>>106957198I had a 1200p laptop display like 20 years ago, it was an alienware or dell with pentium 4 and ati 9800, shit was cash
>>106957130Yeah I have the same problem, using a 4K at 32" and a 1440p at 24.And both have to have upscaling, or else I can't read the text.Sure pixel density is nice but getting even more of it when I can barely use would be useless. I'd have to go with a 60" monitor, basically a TV
>>106955745can't tell if trolling or retardedgpus are getting more and more stagnant as the nvidia monopoly solidifies
>>106956049Reading comprehension failure, everyone else got it just fine. (You) were the genuine retard all along.
>>106957249>tfw 32" 1440p unscaledComfy.
>>106952974how much of a difference do these sunlight shades make? i'm thinking of 3d printing one for my monitor
>>106955536>IT. WILL. NEVER. HAPPEN.remember when people said this about 1080p>>106955756>The average chinese guy has a 4k monitortrue, and they paid less for the exact same model
>>106952974that's a lot of retardation you managed to pack in a single sentence. years of experience i assume.
>>106957922>remember when people said this about 1080p1. Never happened.2. Tech used to actually advance at a non-insignificant pace.3. Vidya is more unoptimized than ever before.4. 1080p wasn't even quad 720p.People are still mostly using 1080p and 1440p panels, yet here you're expecting the absolute overkill quad-quad-1080 to become viable at 120hz+ without an absolutely massive breakthrough in tech. And then the only real usecase is integer scaling from all common lower resolutions, not native. Not worth the premium for most people.
>>106953810Bought a second monitor for 100€life is good if you have bad eyes.
>>106955376Avmonitor is usually at least 2.5 feet away from your face. You can't see the individual pixel on a 96 PPI screen even if you try.
>>106955536>SETTINGS ARE LOW EVERYTHINGI'll have my settings set to 8k@120hz and it will work great.
>>106952974My VR headset is already at 8k. Give me 16k.
I'm 37 and without my glasses I can't tell the difference between 4k and 720p.
>>106955108try that with any media but on a 4K monitor kek
>>106958593A 720p video on a 4k monitor would just be a perfectly scaled 720p video. It'd look just as good as a 720p video on a 720p monitor of the same size
What are the bezels all around it?
>>10695312910k cuz 7 8 9 XD
>>106952974I have a 20 year old 1600x1200LCD that I got in the trash 10 years ago and a 13" TV/VCR combo and I am happyalso I had a stuck pixel that fixed itself on my LCD recently and as I am typing this I realize it's back to being broken again
>>106954815it would if you browsed something other than gay porn, faggot
>>106955536>>120hz@8k would be next>That will never happen.TVs are already 120hz 8k. HDMI 2.1
>>106957220I'm glad thinkpads are back to having 1200p displays as an option.
>you're living in the pastso?
>>1069529741080p is enough.
>>106955013No, they don't. Old organic colorimeters did but not the modern stuff.
>>106957198WUXGA is king. My only issue is there's basically no good panels for it and probably never will be at this point. I'm genuinely considering getting a 27" 1440p and cropping it to 1920x1200.
>>106960583https://eizovisualsolutions.com/monitors/coloredge/cg2420
>>106960873I don't care about wide gamut. I care about response times and no backlight bleed.
>>106960915there are very few panels which are both fast and not extremely shit in every other regard
>>106960951Doesn't seem to be a problem for 16:9 screens.
>>106953048Probably not, for example on a 4k 27" monitor at about 65cm viewing distance you can still see aliasing in video games if they're just running at native res with no AA. It's significantly less than lower resolutions but it's still there, so the pixel density isn't quite there yet but it's getting close. 8k might be above the threshold where you could just render at 8k with no AA and the monitor would have physical pixels so small that aliasing is no longer visible, though I haven't seen any 8k 27" monitor IRL in order to know.
>>106961128isn't most modern slop either a forced low res render upscaled, or so badly optimised that you couldn't render it in native UHD on a nuclear reactor? i still chuckle to myself thinking back on some chucklefuck posting cyberpunk screenshots on here like it was the second coming, when he refused to believe his ebin 4K grafx was all upscaled blurry shit.
>>106952974>MUH 8KMeanwhile it's a shitty IPS panel with shitty blacks and IPS glow and it's slow as fuck.
>>106952974>60hz and the worst input lag and motion clarity imaginableHA HA HA HA
>>106961415after 20 years, we still haven't replaced the CRT
>>106961443OLED looks fine. You just have to buy a new one every year.
>>106953810Based Eizo enjoyer. I've also purchased a few of these for 100-300 dollars when they were worth 3k 6 to 8 years ago.
>>106961469my monitors are set to minimal brightness most times, i think i'll be fine. i'm more worried about shit response times at low brightness.
>>106952974I'm using NEC quality monitor not some pajeTronic chink negro tech.
>>106952974I want a 8k mini-led monitor so i can emulate crt games more efficiently.
>>106960873That panel is ancient. Wow.
>>106963762No, that's just what modern graphic design monitors look like.It looks like Eizo hasn't updated their logo or branding probably since the 1980s, but that's how you know it's good.>>106962537>pajeTronic chink negro techNEC haven't made their monitors in Japan in ages, most of their coveted CRTs were not made there.Eizo still makes their monitors in Japan to this day, but I've heard of QC issues with their products popping up in recent years so I think they don't really manufacture their panels or the components there anymore like they used to.
8k sounds nice but I'm not rich so 4k oled will do until the burnin is visible
>>106952974the human eyes can't see more pixels than 1366x768
>>106960873only 1k, not bad given its a niche and high end product
>>106958573at what distance?
>>106952974>this thing makes 4k look like 720pOnly 720p truly looks like 720p
if you don't have a 480+Hz monitor you're living in the past, they make 60fps look like animated gif
The 8k TV I had did some ai upscaling, it made 1080p movies look really good. I had a 3090 at the time so most games ran about 30-40fps without dropping settings. It was a clarity upgrade over 4k. Going 4k to 8k felt similar to going from 1440p to 4k.
>>106955467>>10695553632" 8k 120fps oleds are in the pipeline for next year unironically i will be playing gaymes at 240p on mine when i get one
>>106966422do they have any dual hz mode?
>>106966434can't remember they were teased earlier this year by some chinese company and LGs rumoured to be releasing their own next year
>>106953025
