File: 1761000894481313.png (9 KB, 246x110)

9 KB PNG

>>106955630
huh

>>106955638
What the FUCK

File: gengar ddg.png (6 KB, 194x49)

6 KB PNG

>>106955630

File: 1761001201685719.png (7 KB, 240x94)

7 KB PNG

?

>>106955638
>>106955674
>>106955677
>>106955630
Lolis?

>>106955638
>>106955674
>>106955677
Adolf Hitler

why when I search for images in duckduckgo I get flooded with ai slop from craiyon? it's horrifying

>>106955630
Also works with Superman and Batman.

>>106955630
Doesn't DDG use Bing as their backend? Bing has a ton of AI slop in their image search results

you can tell it's AI because he looks like a mix of Dr House and Heisenberg

>DUCKDUCKGO GORDON FREEMAN
Is that like "Go go gadget arms" for zoomers

>>106955630
>AI images: show
Are you retarded?

>>106955863
yes

File: IMG_20251020_212126.jpg (374 KB, 720x1321)

374 KB JPG

>>106955630
Meanwhile Brave

>duckduckgo uses BING for its backend now
how the mighty hath fallen lmao

>>106955638
>>106955674
>>106955677
svol

>>106956402
It always has

i am glad there is an ai image search option to prevent ai images but i fear the day ai is so indistingushable nobody can tell
but what i have heard is this will lead to people shutting off the computers and going outside
i think some, but i suspect most not, which is sad

why does he look like allan jude?

>>106956388
100% checks out, also brave's image results are useless

>>106955754
Gek they blocked that one

>>106955630
Current year+10 and still using CuckCuckJew? Even after everyone knows they sell data and censor results?

>>106955821
50% Bing
Google, their own crawlers and others are used too
It uses mixed results and pushes better sites up the list too, especially for tech related searhes. It's one of the best results last year or so IMO

File: file.png (6 KB, 195x72)

6 KB PNG

>>106955674
Well, that's disappointing.

File: 1752727629984632.png (1.66 MB, 1910x817)

1.66 MB PNG

goggel

>>106955630
The Internet Belongs to the Machines NOW, Enjoy your Retirement Humans.

>>106955674
>>106960089
search for Paddington bear

winnie the pooh too

>>106955638
>huh
Cute. I noticed this when searching for Mona Lisa. Didn't expect it to exist for characters as "niche" as Gordon Freeman though. Makes me wonder how many of these exist and if there's a website listing all of them somewhere

>>106955630
https://duckduckgo.com/duckduckgo-help-pages/results/how-to-filter-out-ai-images-in-duckduckgo-search-results

File: file.png (37 KB, 290x134)

37 KB PNG

>>106960145
The ones I have tried:
Alien, Pennywise, Freddy Krueger, predator
Labubu
Donald Duck and Daffy Duck will replace the duck rather than cosplaying (does not work with Howard the Duck)
Uncle Scrooge
Pretty much every well known marvel character
babadook
Hello Kitty, Naruto, Doraemon
Sherlock
george Washington, Abraham Lincoln
Gandalf, Neo, Agent Smith, Morpheus, godzilla, Iron Giant, Spock...

howard the duck

AI being literally everywhere, and replacing so much human art fills me with despair. This shit is dystopian.

>search engine implements AI
>it becomes unusable shit
Every single time...

File: fail.jpg (19 KB, 704x287)

19 KB JPG

Gay ass duck

I literally just waha'd at my screen

File: file.png (29 KB, 387x141)

29 KB PNG

>>106960620

>>106960617
What would an Ema Watson Halloween costume even look like?

File: file.png (4 KB, 212x63)

4 KB PNG

Crash-bros...

>>106955630
>search [thing]
>first result is either a random wiki page for something related to [thing] or a random inactive fork

>>106955638
sovl

File: 1756266885303850.png (48 KB, 713x293)

48 KB PNG

well I had to try it

and it was there lol

>>106960776
ever heard of harry potter? it's pretty obv.

cuckcuckgoy

File: Capture.gif (18 KB, 365x160)

18 KB GIF

retard

File: 1753128923944977.png (42 KB, 729x266)

42 KB PNG

shit i'll be doing this for an hour at least

File: 1748963318254806.png (47 KB, 959x296)

47 KB PNG

>>106960776
no emma
only hermione

>>106955638
>it's real

File: Screenshot 2025-10-21 at (...).png (300 KB, 1012x618)

300 KB PNG

>>106955630
>There's yer problem

File: 1758907643113071.png (6 KB, 251x71)

6 KB PNG

>imagine you don't own nothing guy is in
>rest of band members are not
WOKE

>>106960863
>Capture.gif
> retard
checks out

>>106955630
>slop
ai will replace you, you failed "artist"

>>106961842
What if I simply prefer seeing things done by people

>>106961910
I can get into real debate about it- but answer this:
Hypothetically speaking- what if you cannot tell the difference? Having any tools and all the time in the world and you cannot tell the difference?

>>106961957
I would inquire who made it because I want to see things done by people. If it wasn't made by a person but a machine I would feel very disappointed upon finding out.

>>106962009
So you judge something if it's done by a human or not, no matter the quality or (potentially) the price?
I respect that you admit you have no real logical reason for not wanting AI generated content but you only judge it by your own emotion.
Most people would try to make an argument that just cannot have any logic behind it as the premise itself is illogical.
You should not worry, you will always have "true" human art and other type of creation.
You will pay for it more and it will be of lower quality (subjective for you) but you will HAVE it.

>>106961957
then all art becomes worthless. you can start to assume everything is made with ai simply because it requires the least effort.

>>106962055
art is already worthless

>>106962055
if it becomes worthless just by not being able to tell the difference, that would imply it was worthless from the start.
If you give a "worth" to something by how and by who it's made and not by the end product itself (be it a art, game, a chair or anything) you are encouraging glorification of the creator even if creators work is not good.

>>106961957
>Hypothetically speaking- what if you cannot tell the difference? Having any tools and all the time in the world and you cannot tell the difference?
Your hypothetical is incoherent because with all the tools and time in the world, because I choose a tool that spies on everyone all the time to document the process by which every image is made, which makes for a difference I can associate with a given image.

>>106961842
No, it won't.

>>106962095
>If you give a "worth" to something by how and by who it's made and not by the end product itself (be it a art, game, a chair or anything) you are encouraging glorification of the creator even if creators work is not good.
Wrong. He is simply encouraging consideration of the process by which something is made.

>>106962113
That is just a cheat, a smartass answer for not finding real difference. Quite idiotic ngl
>>106962139
That is what I've said, just paraphrased so it does not sound "wrong" to you. Only reason to "consider" how something was made in this case is for it to be judged by if it's made by human or not and if it give greater subjective value to a human creator it glorifies creators over creation.

I am an artist (sculptor for 25, don't make a living of it) and if somebody asked me would I rather people remember my creation or me, I'd say creation every time. Not even if it's OR question, just creations are what is of any actual value.

>>106962095
art is pure expression. more effort means more decisions to be made, therefore more room for expression. otherwise all you have is a meaningless pretty picture.
choosing a diffusion model over a physical medium, for example, expresses something too: that you didn't care.

>>106962205
>That is just a cheat
No, you just got filtered by the point being made.

>That is what I've said
No, you wrote:
>encouraging glorification of the creator even if creators work is not good.
And I wrote:
>consideration of the process by which something is made.

>I am an artist
No, you're an average Americoon golem with a damaged consumerist psyche, displaying symptoms of the "capitalist" mental illness that causes golems to claim cheap, mass-produced ersatz is just like the real thing so long as you can't tell the difference.

>>106962311
>No, you just got filtered by the point being made
You are a literal example of a meme about niggers and how would they feel if they did not have a breakfast
At no point in you points have made anythings resembling a logical argument and I've stopped reading once I've realized I am dealing with complete moron.
You are most likely some non-white sub-human or 'murican mutt.
Have a nice day

>>106962261
We're coming back at the start
>If you cannot tell the difference in any way what does it matter if it's human made or not?
In the end it does not matter and there are cases where "artist" went on and on about some art how AI can never achieve such things and the art in question was Ai generated.
Such things will happen more and more and people who judge art by if it's made by human or not will lose any sense of what they are even trying to do.

>>106962353
You are a literal example of 90 IQ white trash coming up with a hypothetical that's internally inconsistent, failing to understand this criticism and reverting to a preprogrammed (and irrelevant) rhetorical pattern like the biobot that you are.

>>106962382
>In the end it does not matter
Why not? Hard mode: without circular reasoning.

>>106962411
Let us create a thought experiment:

We have some kind of an art in front of ourself for which we cannot know if it is made by human or an AI or a human using AI, expressing his concept for AI to create where he cannot -example he is full paraplegic.
What do we do?
>Ignore it because we do not how it's made and judge it worthless?
it is not a good solution as it can ignore human creation
>Presume it is made by human and then judge it's worth?
it is not good as we might "humanize" ai creation
>presume it is made by AI and judge it that way?
if it's made by a human we are doing that person wrong

If we cannot know if the art is created by a human or by an AI in some way we are left to judge the art in itself or ignore it.
Ignoring is bad choice in my opinion with many faults as explained above so that leaves only judging the art as it is and so in the end, who or what made it does not matter if the art is judged to be "good".

The only other way is forbid usage of AI in all forms which is the worst option.

>>106962506
>>Ignore it because we do not how it's made and judge it worthless?
>it is not a good solution as it can ignore human creation
Sounds like your arbitrary opinion. To me it sounds like a pretty good solution barring every possibility of telling it apart from AI slop.

>>106962542
Then we get to my point that such arbitrary opinion as yours results in making all art worthless.
You most likely wont be able to tell difference in relativity near future (baring some legal mandate to force difference, like salting the data) and you choice of ignoring art would make all art by default worthless to you and anyone who shares your arbitrary opinions.
You would be limited to any art that you decided is not made by an AI for which you will have no proof except trust in whoever made it or intimate knowledge of entire creative process.

>>106962594
>arbitrary opinion
That's literally all you expressed here.

>results in making all art worthless
How does that follow from one particular example where it's impossible to ascertain if a human made something?

>>106962615
>>arbitrary opinion
>That's literally all you expressed here.
likewise
>>>results in making all art worthless
>How does that follow from one particular example where it's impossible to ascertain if a human made something?
Are you really asking me that? You? You who decided that human made art will be ignored as worthless if you cannot know if it is made by human or not? Such choice would ignore ANY art that you do not have intimate knowledge of it's creative processes.
And I said
>all
but added after
>You would be limited to any art that you decided is not made by an AI for which you will have no proof except trust in whoever made it or intimate knowledge of entire creative process.
You are ignoring way too much of what I say for me to pay any more attention to this than I already have.

>>106962677
I asked you to prove your claim. You answered by making another (unjustifiable) claim. Learn how to make an actual argument.
>Are you really asking me that?
Yes. Please explain how "all art is worthless" follows from my ignoring art that (purely by theoretical postulation) can't be ascertained as human. You won't because you can't because it's just your schizophrenia.

>>106962615
>arguing with the sewage leaking from /pol/
Waste of time. Americoons are nonwhite and can't actually reason.

File: Capture d’écran_2025-10-2(...).png (29 KB, 562x203)

29 KB PNG

nice, also neo and morpheus

File: imagen_2025-10-21_114454066.png (9 KB, 434x97)

9 KB PNG

>>106955630

File: 2025-10-21 21-34-50.png (16 KB, 272x164)

16 KB PNG

I'm a little disappointed.

File: 1743519843031955.png (6 KB, 188x63)

6 KB PNG

neat

>>106956388
Yooo, you guys remember big chungus?

>>106955630
Wow it's like watching the plot of Metal Gear Solid 2: Sons of Liberty in real time

>>106963746
do the bsds

File: Screenshot_20251021_193411.png (5 KB, 161x60)

5 KB PNG

>>106963581

>>106965043
Do the forbidden 4 letters starting with p and ending with c

File: duck-duck-minecraft.png (15 KB, 358x113)

15 KB PNG

minecraft

File: duckboy.png (14 KB, 444x115)

14 KB PNG

cowboy works too

File: IMG_2732.jpg (50 KB, 1019x212)

50 KB JPG

Behold Him!

File: Screenshot_20251021_213057.png (5 KB, 165x62)

5 KB PNG

Wholesome 100

File: duckler.png (3 KB, 190x72)

3 KB PNG

>>106955754
naw, they got it